Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO stuff
Posted by
Par Willen
on 2000-03-12 22:48:51 UTC
Elliot Burke wrote...
saving for us newbies, thanks to all ye contributors.
Second: Aha! (And if I had put my brain in gear before posting I
should've figured that out just by reading the ordering information on
US Digitals website, the resolution is specific to the module...)
OK, moving on: Is there any technical reason why you use the "3" as a
multiplier in your example above? I would be very happy indeed to get a
resolution of 360 x 2 if the quadrature works with that. And if so, has
anybody seen any 720 lpi strips? : )
Regards
PiPPi
> The HEDS-9XXX encoder optics are set up for a specific grating pitch, soFirst: This list and r.c.m is literallly a gold mine in time and money
> using them with a higher pitch won't work. They contain multiple very
> narrow detectors connected to each amplifier. With a different pitch they
> won't all be in phase, hence lower output. There is some chance that a 360
> x 3 = 1080 lines/inch there might be some output, maybe not enough to work
> the electronics.
saving for us newbies, thanks to all ye contributors.
Second: Aha! (And if I had put my brain in gear before posting I
should've figured that out just by reading the ordering information on
US Digitals website, the resolution is specific to the module...)
OK, moving on: Is there any technical reason why you use the "3" as a
multiplier in your example above? I would be very happy indeed to get a
resolution of 360 x 2 if the quadrature works with that. And if so, has
anybody seen any 720 lpi strips? : )
Regards
PiPPi
Discussion Thread
Par Willen
2000-03-12 22:48:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO stuff
D.F.S.
2000-03-13 09:59:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO stuff
james owens
2000-03-13 11:00:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO stuff
David M. Munro
2000-03-13 18:29:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO stuff
Ken Lowther
2000-03-14 04:32:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO stuff
Jon Elson
2000-03-17 23:16:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO stuff