Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO stuff
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2000-03-17 23:16:55 UTC
"Arne Chr. Jorgensen" wrote:
high
resolution with no need for interpolation. Gratings with over 1000
lines/inch
(roughly 40 lines/mm) are no big problem for the industries that make
them.
Not so easy for the home shop machinist, though.
The inductosyn needs interpolation, which is a substantial complication.
There are chips to handle the entire interpolation job, but they are
expensive.
Making an inductosyn by printed circuit board techniques might work
well.
Cutting grooves in some insulating material and laying wires into the
grooves
sounds like it would be hard to get sufficient accuracy to beat even a
low
resolution optical scale, and it also sounds like a LOT of work.
SORTS of exotic
sophistication in the AD 2S80 series to knock out sources of error.
Also, if you want
to make a CNC system, not a DRO, you need a position update rate of at
least 1 KHz,
maybe more, to keep a system like EMC happy.
super-expensive
Mitutoyo calipers do better than .0005" resolution. And, the accuracy
must be
less than the resolution.
about 2 cm, to bridge
the space between squares on the spar. I think the strips are about 1
cm long, long enough
to cover the squares.
Jon
> From: "Arne Chr. Jorgensen" <instel@...>The advantage is that optical measuring systems can be made with fairly
>
> Hi,
>
> First, - thanks Jon for the link to the datasheets. I have not looked
> at it
> yet, and it may take some time.
>
> { the ISP problem - after a short time - I am down to 6 bps, or the
> line
> comes to a full halt. (They are working on it) }
>
> Why do you insist on an optical system ? Do you now something that I
> don't ?
high
resolution with no need for interpolation. Gratings with over 1000
lines/inch
(roughly 40 lines/mm) are no big problem for the industries that make
them.
Not so easy for the home shop machinist, though.
The inductosyn needs interpolation, which is a substantial complication.
There are chips to handle the entire interpolation job, but they are
expensive.
Making an inductosyn by printed circuit board techniques might work
well.
Cutting grooves in some insulating material and laying wires into the
grooves
sounds like it would be hard to get sufficient accuracy to beat even a
low
resolution optical scale, and it also sounds like a LOT of work.
> Don't missunderstand me - but I would like to dwell a little more onOh, don't be so sure, until you've read the data sheets. they have all
> these
> other systems.
>
> Sure, the price on these chips may be high, - but you could make a
> cheaper
> circuit, - I think. I fully agree about the PCB layout, - I just
> mentioned it
> could be done in some other way.
SORTS of exotic
sophistication in the AD 2S80 series to knock out sources of error.
Also, if you want
to make a CNC system, not a DRO, you need a position update rate of at
least 1 KHz,
maybe more, to keep a system like EMC happy.
> Jan wrote: ( He is to blame, if the Mitutoyo stocks went up :)Yes, but a caliper gets maybe 5 updates a second, and only the
> -------
> > My <$100 Mitutoyo is "perfect" and just keeps on working and working
> and
> > working... And, it is SUPER-accurate! I can't believe it
>
> Well, this is the stuff that make me want to investigate into other
> than just
> optical systems.
super-expensive
Mitutoyo calipers do better than .0005" resolution. And, the accuracy
must be
less than the resolution.
> Jon wrote:I thought there were about 25 strips, and they must cover a length of
> -------
> >The Chinese scale has little squares about 2 mm square of copper
> >on a PC board material, with the squares ocurring about every 2 cm.
> The
> >head has a bunch of thin lines all connected to the control chip.
> <snip>
> > .. strips are only about 3 or 4 per mm, at the most.
>
> How large is the area that these thin lines enclose ?
> How many of them ?
about 2 cm, to bridge
the space between squares on the spar. I think the strips are about 1
cm long, long enough
to cover the squares.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Par Willen
2000-03-12 22:48:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO stuff
D.F.S.
2000-03-13 09:59:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO stuff
james owens
2000-03-13 11:00:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO stuff
David M. Munro
2000-03-13 18:29:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO stuff
Ken Lowther
2000-03-14 04:32:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO stuff
Jon Elson
2000-03-17 23:16:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO stuff