Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Doesnt ANYONE have this drawn up??? was: John's CNC plans???
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2003-08-14 22:16:06 UTC
Kim Lux wrote:
(Y axis, and the left X axis) are a matched set of spacer-preloaded
bearings, and I have tested them, and found them to be BETTER at
axially constraining the leadscrew than the angular-contact bearing pair
in my high-precision CNC axis drives. (Due to the size of the ballscrews
I used, I couldn't use the original bearings.) But, there was NOTHING
wrong with them, and they would be fine for a ballscrew installation.
Now, I can't vouch for the bearings in a Rong-Fu or some low-budget
bridgeport clone from China. Undoubtedly, they are not of the same
quality.
A larger machine is almost certainly stiffer, and therefore can be more
accurate. Also, the larger machine can accept jobs that the smaller machine
has to do in several setups, thereby compromising accuracy.
workpiece cool can improve accuracy, and prevent the dreaded
"ball up" of aluminum on endmills.
Jon
>I highly disagree with using existing parts.The XF-12 bearings in a REAL Bridgeport screw mounting bracket
>
>First of all, the bearings used on the ends of ACME screws generally
>aren't the sort that would be used on a zero backlash ballscrew setup.
>The runout, etc. on them is not suitable. In my opinion they need to be
>replaced with a more suitable bearing, like a 7302, a precision angular
>contact bearing.
>
>Once you realize the need to replace those bearings, the existing
>bearing holders are useless. Making new bearing mounts also allows the
>motor to mounted for direct drive.
>
>
>
(Y axis, and the left X axis) are a matched set of spacer-preloaded
bearings, and I have tested them, and found them to be BETTER at
axially constraining the leadscrew than the angular-contact bearing pair
in my high-precision CNC axis drives. (Due to the size of the ballscrews
I used, I couldn't use the original bearings.) But, there was NOTHING
wrong with them, and they would be fine for a ballscrew installation.
Now, I can't vouch for the bearings in a Rong-Fu or some low-budget
bridgeport clone from China. Undoubtedly, they are not of the same
quality.
>Some other thoughts:I wholeheartedly agree with this, but not only for the power reason.
>
>a) convert as large a machine as you can. The speed with which things
>can be done on a CNC machine are only limited by the cutting power, so
>bigger = faster.
>
>
A larger machine is almost certainly stiffer, and therefore can be more
accurate. Also, the larger machine can accept jobs that the smaller machine
has to do in several setups, thereby compromising accuracy.
>b) don't overlook coolant and chip handling. Coolant is an absoluteYup, this is also true. And, I always want to point out that keeping the
>necessity on these machines because the cutting rates are easily
>adjusted via feed override to be high. Chips will accumulate faster
>than you can imagine when running multiple parts and high cutting
>speeds.
>
>
workpiece cool can improve accuracy, and prevent the dreaded
"ball up" of aluminum on endmills.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Jon Elson
2003-08-14 22:16:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Doesnt ANYONE have this drawn up??? was: John's CNC plans???
Vince Negrete
2003-08-15 03:27:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Doesnt ANYONE have this drawn up??? was: John's CNC plans???
Kim Lux
2003-08-15 07:16:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Doesnt ANYONE have this drawn up??? was: John's CNC plans???
ccq@x...
2003-08-15 08:14:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Doesnt ANYONE have this drawn up??? was:
Kim Lux
2003-08-15 08:22:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Doesnt ANYONE have this drawn up??? was:
Bill Kichman
2003-08-15 09:10:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Doesnt ANYONE have this drawn up??? was:
Steven Ciciora
2003-08-15 09:13:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Doesnt ANYONE have this drawn up??? was: