Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] SUGGESTION ABOUT NEW 3 AXIS DRIVER
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2003-08-15 22:01:22 UTC
luisguillermo98 wrote:
drive. It is 3 Amps, only. It can only handle 46 V DC supply, the Gecko
can handle 80 V. For very small motors, that doesn't matter, but for larger
motors, it is a problem. Their higher inductance requires move voltage
to move at the higher speeds. I get good torque at 1440 RPM with size
34 motors, which is astounding. The Gecko drives also do x 10
microstepping,
and have circuits to damp resonance. These Brewington drives are
half-step only. I see no indication that it has opto-isolation between the
drive and the parallel port. They are Unipolar, which is another severe
strike against them, as most unipolar drives perform poorly when compared
to bipolar. They say they can accept 10,000 steps/second, but in practice
I doubt they can get anywhere near this before the motors lose steps.
And, that's just a start!
Jon
>I need to know if aomeone has try the the 3 axis driver found atI can already tell you, it is nowhere as sophisticated as a Gecko stepper
>http://www.brewingtontech.com/index.html..
>
>tell me about your experience working with it and if it works fine
>like geckodrivers.. any suggestions..
>
>
drive. It is 3 Amps, only. It can only handle 46 V DC supply, the Gecko
can handle 80 V. For very small motors, that doesn't matter, but for larger
motors, it is a problem. Their higher inductance requires move voltage
to move at the higher speeds. I get good torque at 1440 RPM with size
34 motors, which is astounding. The Gecko drives also do x 10
microstepping,
and have circuits to damp resonance. These Brewington drives are
half-step only. I see no indication that it has opto-isolation between the
drive and the parallel port. They are Unipolar, which is another severe
strike against them, as most unipolar drives perform poorly when compared
to bipolar. They say they can accept 10,000 steps/second, but in practice
I doubt they can get anywhere near this before the motors lose steps.
And, that's just a start!
Jon
Discussion Thread
Tim Goldstein
2003-08-15 13:54:36 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] SUGGESTION ABOUT NEW 3 AXIS DRIVER
Jon Elson
2003-08-15 22:01:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] SUGGESTION ABOUT NEW 3 AXIS DRIVER
jeffalanp
2003-08-16 00:14:50 UTC
Re: SUGGESTION ABOUT NEW 3 AXIS DRIVER
luisguillermo98
2003-08-16 09:28:41 UTC
Re: SUGGESTION ABOUT NEW 3 AXIS DRIVER
luisguillermo98
2003-08-16 09:28:51 UTC
Re: SUGGESTION ABOUT NEW 3 AXIS DRIVER
jeffalanp
2003-08-16 09:48:48 UTC
Re: SUGGESTION ABOUT NEW 3 AXIS DRIVER
luisguillermo98
2003-08-16 11:44:51 UTC
Re: SUGGESTION ABOUT NEW 3 AXIS DRIVER
Jon Elson
2003-08-16 22:39:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: SUGGESTION ABOUT NEW 3 AXIS DRIVER
Jon Elson
2003-08-16 22:54:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: SUGGESTION ABOUT NEW 3 AXIS DRIVER
grantfair2001
2003-08-17 01:09:53 UTC
Value of Zener diodes
Pablo Valbuena
2003-08-17 09:17:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: SUGGESTION ABOUT NEW 3 AXIS DRIVER
Antonius J.M. Groothuizen
2003-08-17 09:22:32 UTC
Re: Value of Zener diodes
jeffalanp
2003-08-17 10:52:09 UTC
Re: SUGGESTION ABOUT NEW 3 AXIS DRIVER
Jon Elson
2003-08-17 14:26:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Value of Zener diodes
grantfair2001
2003-08-17 15:17:01 UTC
Re: Value of Zener diodes
Jon Elson
2003-08-17 22:55:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Value of Zener diodes
grantfair2001
2003-08-18 23:48:14 UTC
Re: Value of Zener diodes
ballendo
2003-08-19 08:33:04 UTC
Re: SUGGESTION ABOUT NEW 3 AXIS DRIVER
Jon Elson
2003-08-19 10:32:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Value of Zener diodes