Re: dinky microstepping driver ? Linistepper
Posted by
ballendo
on 2003-09-08 06:44:19 UTC
Dave,
Romans honesty in specs might be misread from your post...
Very few microstepping drives are actually accurate at each step.
Roman is just saying this. His drive is no less precise in its steps
than most any other microstepping drive... In fact, it can be tuned
to be more precise to a specific motor if you can "do" pic
programming.
And the 3600 IS based on a std. 1.8 degree motor and its 200 full
steps/rev. So yes, up to 3600 microsteps per rev.
BTW, The Xylotex bd is also 35 volts, and so is the 5804 unipolar
chip. Until the recent Gecko debut, 24 and 35 volt stepper drives
were really common. Still are... I've run 297/298 drives at 34 volts
for years... Plenty of torque, since torque is amps, not volts. And
Jeff can speak to the speed available at 24 volts with his Xylotex
bds...
And while we're talking volts, be sure to read what Roman has to say
about the subject in his description/ tutorial. When I first saw
these about 6 or so months ago (and ordered a few), I was thankful
that someone was saying something besides "Ya gotta run at 10-25
times the motor rating..." Different drives perform differently, and
to try to use the specs/recommendations for one to evaluate another
can be a bad choice. The proof is in whether the needs of the
application get met.
25 bucks and some solder time instead of hundreds? Not a bad trade,
IMO. And these drives, as I posted already, are pretty nice. And
cheap. Just hot.
Hope this helps,
Ballendo
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "turbulatordude" <snip> Also,
it does 3,600 microsteps, but again the data sheet clearly
Romans honesty in specs might be misread from your post...
Very few microstepping drives are actually accurate at each step.
Roman is just saying this. His drive is no less precise in its steps
than most any other microstepping drive... In fact, it can be tuned
to be more precise to a specific motor if you can "do" pic
programming.
And the 3600 IS based on a std. 1.8 degree motor and its 200 full
steps/rev. So yes, up to 3600 microsteps per rev.
BTW, The Xylotex bd is also 35 volts, and so is the 5804 unipolar
chip. Until the recent Gecko debut, 24 and 35 volt stepper drives
were really common. Still are... I've run 297/298 drives at 34 volts
for years... Plenty of torque, since torque is amps, not volts. And
Jeff can speak to the speed available at 24 volts with his Xylotex
bds...
And while we're talking volts, be sure to read what Roman has to say
about the subject in his description/ tutorial. When I first saw
these about 6 or so months ago (and ordered a few), I was thankful
that someone was saying something besides "Ya gotta run at 10-25
times the motor rating..." Different drives perform differently, and
to try to use the specs/recommendations for one to evaluate another
can be a bad choice. The proof is in whether the needs of the
application get met.
25 bucks and some solder time instead of hundreds? Not a bad trade,
IMO. And these drives, as I posted already, are pretty nice. And
cheap. Just hot.
Hope this helps,
Ballendo
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "turbulatordude" <snip> Also,
it does 3,600 microsteps, but again the data sheet clearly
> says...many other benefits gained from the increased smoothness.)"
>
> "(The stepper motor itself will not position accurately down to one
> 3600th of a turn, but there is still good useful positioning and
>on
> For my purposes, that is fine, but it does not offer most CNC
> applications an accurate step.
>
> AND, this is WRONG to begin with. the unit offers FULL step, HALF
> step, 1/6th Step and 1/18th Step. depending on your motor depends
> how many steps per revolution. NOT 3,600 microsteps, that would beI'm
> depending on the motor and refers to steps per revolution.
>
> The data sheets list 35 volts as the max power supply, but since
> not trying to get high torque, this should be fine.
>
> If anybody has used these and want to offer some advise on use,
> please feel free.
>
> Dave
Discussion Thread
turbulatordude
2003-09-06 19:25:42 UTC
dinky microstepping driver ?
Jon Elson
2003-09-06 21:30:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] dinky microstepping driver ?
ballendo
2003-09-07 01:44:19 UTC
Re: dinky microstepping driver ?
turbulatordude
2003-09-07 09:26:14 UTC
Re: dinky microstepping driver ? Linistepper
jeffalanp
2003-09-07 10:05:47 UTC
Re: dinky microstepping driver ?
Mariss Freimanis
2003-09-07 12:14:31 UTC
Re: dinky microstepping driver ?
Tony Jeffree
2003-09-07 12:34:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: dinky microstepping driver ?
turbulatordude
2003-09-07 14:54:41 UTC
Re: dinky microstepping driver ?
Harvey White
2003-09-07 15:27:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: dinky microstepping driver ?
ballendo
2003-09-08 06:44:19 UTC
Re: dinky microstepping driver ? Linistepper
turbulatordude
2003-09-08 09:21:12 UTC
Re: dinky microstepping driver ? Linistepper
James Stevens
2003-09-08 09:52:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: dinky microstepping driver ?
Raymond Heckert
2003-09-08 11:27:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: dinky microstepping driver ?
Jeff Jones
2003-09-09 07:44:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: dinky microstepping driver ?
shroffja
2003-09-10 07:33:45 UTC
Re: dinky microstepping driver ?