Re: From Gerber/Excellon to finished PCB
Posted by
ghidera2000
on 2003-09-09 08:47:42 UTC
Ah ok, and here I thought G-Code and Gerber were completely
different things.
I took a look at my Gerber output (QCad has both 274 D and X). The
big difference seems to be formatting. No spaces and no decimal
points on my files.
Heh, the 274 standard doesn't seem to be all that standard. Some
want 2.3, some 2.4, some with decimal points and some without...
different things.
I took a look at my Gerber output (QCad has both 274 D and X). The
big difference seems to be formatting. No spaces and no decimal
points on my files.
Heh, the 274 standard doesn't seem to be all that standard. Some
want 2.3, some 2.4, some with decimal points and some without...
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Jon Elson <elson@p...> wrote:
>
>
> ballendo wrote:
>
> >Hello,
> >
> >Jon knows this, just a typo likely, but g code is RS-274D, not
232.
> >
> >Hope this prevents confusion,
> >
> >
> >
> OOps, thats what I get for typing answers late at night! Yes, it
is
> RS-274D,
> the 1974 spec for machine tool programming language.
>
> Jon
Discussion Thread
ghidera2000
2003-09-07 08:10:44 UTC
From Gerber/Excellon to finished PCB
Jon Elson
2003-09-07 21:39:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] From Gerber/Excellon to finished PCB
ballendo
2003-09-08 06:49:40 UTC
Re: From Gerber/Excellon to finished PCB
Jon Elson
2003-09-08 09:37:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: From Gerber/Excellon to finished PCB
ghidera2000
2003-09-09 08:47:42 UTC
Re: From Gerber/Excellon to finished PCB
Jon Elson
2003-09-09 10:25:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: From Gerber/Excellon to finished PCB