Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: From Gerber/Excellon to finished PCB
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2003-09-09 10:25:41 UTC
ghidera2000 wrote:
specifier". This part is completely foreign to the RS-274D spec,
in G-code it looks like a comment.
%FSLAX2.4Y2.4
This would mean format spec, L for suppress leading digits, then
A for absolute positions, and then the X and Y axes are both set to
2.4, meaning 2 digits to the left, and 4 to the right of the implied
decimal point.
The normal spec of RS-274D allows this, but doesn't provide this
FS mechanism for carrying the format definition along IN the file.
Jon
>Ah ok, and here I thought G-Code and Gerber were completelyRight. You should have a line, usually the first one, that is a "format
>different things.
>
>I took a look at my Gerber output (QCad has both 274 D and X). The
>big difference seems to be formatting. No spaces and no decimal
>points on my files.
>
>
specifier". This part is completely foreign to the RS-274D spec,
in G-code it looks like a comment.
%FSLAX2.4Y2.4
This would mean format spec, L for suppress leading digits, then
A for absolute positions, and then the X and Y axes are both set to
2.4, meaning 2 digits to the left, and 4 to the right of the implied
decimal point.
The normal spec of RS-274D allows this, but doesn't provide this
FS mechanism for carrying the format definition along IN the file.
Jon
Discussion Thread
ghidera2000
2003-09-07 08:10:44 UTC
From Gerber/Excellon to finished PCB
Jon Elson
2003-09-07 21:39:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] From Gerber/Excellon to finished PCB
ballendo
2003-09-08 06:49:40 UTC
Re: From Gerber/Excellon to finished PCB
Jon Elson
2003-09-08 09:37:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: From Gerber/Excellon to finished PCB
ghidera2000
2003-09-09 08:47:42 UTC
Re: From Gerber/Excellon to finished PCB
Jon Elson
2003-09-09 10:25:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: From Gerber/Excellon to finished PCB