CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: From Gerber/Excellon to finished PCB

Posted by Jon Elson
on 2003-09-09 10:25:41 UTC
ghidera2000 wrote:

>Ah ok, and here I thought G-Code and Gerber were completely
>different things.
>
>I took a look at my Gerber output (QCad has both 274 D and X). The
>big difference seems to be formatting. No spaces and no decimal
>points on my files.
>
>
Right. You should have a line, usually the first one, that is a "format
specifier". This part is completely foreign to the RS-274D spec,
in G-code it looks like a comment.

%FSLAX2.4Y2.4

This would mean format spec, L for suppress leading digits, then
A for absolute positions, and then the X and Y axes are both set to
2.4, meaning 2 digits to the left, and 4 to the right of the implied
decimal point.

The normal spec of RS-274D allows this, but doesn't provide this
FS mechanism for carrying the format definition along IN the file.

Jon

Discussion Thread

ghidera2000 2003-09-07 08:10:44 UTC From Gerber/Excellon to finished PCB Jon Elson 2003-09-07 21:39:55 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] From Gerber/Excellon to finished PCB ballendo 2003-09-08 06:49:40 UTC Re: From Gerber/Excellon to finished PCB Jon Elson 2003-09-08 09:37:11 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: From Gerber/Excellon to finished PCB ghidera2000 2003-09-09 08:47:42 UTC Re: From Gerber/Excellon to finished PCB Jon Elson 2003-09-09 10:25:41 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: From Gerber/Excellon to finished PCB