CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Lathes for retrofit

Posted by James Cullins
on 2003-10-30 05:34:51 UTC
Are you talking about the CQ6120X320
LATHEMASTER 8 X 14 MINI ?
Jim
----- Original Message -----
From: "ballendo" <ballendo@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 7:26 AM
Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Lathes for retrofit


> David,
>
> Snips, inserts below:
>
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "David A. Frantz"
> <wizard@e...> wrote:
> >As far as actual conversion what advantages foes the Lathemaster
> >lathe provide over the others? It does seem to be difficult to
> >get comments form people concerning the Lathemaster lathe. The
> >are always plenty of comments on how to get the HF and Grizzley
> >lathes running but very little on the Lathemaster.
>
> The chief advantage of the lathemaster for CNC is what I mentioned;
> there is less stuff to remove and/or work around to complete the
> conversion. The reason there is not much about it on my 9x20Lathe
> group is that for manual use, the "std" 9x20's are far superior,
> except for a steel only shop where the lower speed at teh bottom end
> is appreciated. Less so with modern tooling...
>
> Which brings me to the next consideration for a CNC conversion, the
> drive train of a CNC lathe is likely going to be an upgrade to a VFD.
> A lathemaster has spindle gears which may allow for more flexibility
> when using a cheap VFD setup (I'm not a fan of cheap Import gear
> trains, so I'd just drive it direct.) But again , the Lathemaster has
> less "junk" in the way to remove(Can we just call it a Bv20 style?
> The "lathemaster" is just a popular version OF the Bv20.)
>
>
> >It is interesting your comments on the manual aspects of the
> >Grizzley, HF and similar lathes. That is all well and good but if
> >you really want flexibility, even for manual operations, the
> >rational thing to do would be to motorize those axis. Hardinge
> >has been doing this for just about forever on their tool room
> >lathes, unfortunately not direct drive but very flexible none the
> >less.
>
> You're preaching to the choir here<G> My 9x20Lathe group is the
> opposite of here; nearly entirely manual users, so we tend to stay
> OFF the subject of CNC, the same way here we stay OFF the subject of
> manual machining... (Personally, I like and use both manual and CNC,
> but not on the same machine! I still think preserving the handwheels
> on a CNC retrofit is a poor choice.)
>
> > Thanks
> > Dave
>
> You're welcome.
>
> Ballendo
>
>
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...,
timg@...
> Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... [Moderators]
> URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>
> OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if
you have trouble.
> http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be a
sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT
subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
>
> NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM.
DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
> bill
> List Mom
> List Owner
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>

Discussion Thread

James Cullins 2003-10-30 05:34:51 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Lathes for retrofit ballendo 2003-10-30 06:04:58 UTC Re: Lathes for retrofit James Cullins 2003-10-30 07:06:03 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lathes for retrofit Kim Lux 2003-10-31 08:14:01 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lathes for retrofit