Re: Kipware/Kentech-inc
Posted by
stevenson_engineers
on 2003-11-01 12:15:05 UTC
>--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "kakushaku" <kakushaku@y...>Yes I got that on your first post thank you, I never mentioned it
> The point of this post is that the IJK issue that you mention has
> been resolved to convert the standard R output into INCREMENTAL IJK
> and even ABSOLUTE IJK ... allowing the issue you mention to go
> away ... and we not only addressed that issue but provided
>additional
> flexibility through the design of KipwareXC package.
>
again.
I was asking how user configerable the 'post' program was in respect
of the question asked about TurboCNC, namely one G code per line.
John S.
Discussion Thread
Brian
2003-10-31 07:45:52 UTC
Kipware/Kentech-inc
kdoney_63021
2003-10-31 15:54:10 UTC
Re: Kipware/Kentech-inc
stevenson_engineers
2003-11-01 00:18:08 UTC
Re: Kipware/Kentech-inc
kakushaku
2003-11-01 07:49:23 UTC
Re: Kipware/Kentech-inc
Brian
2003-11-01 07:50:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Kipware/Kentech-inc
Brian
2003-11-01 07:50:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Kipware/Kentech-inc
stevenson_engineers
2003-11-01 08:19:17 UTC
Re: Kipware/Kentech-inc
kakushaku
2003-11-01 11:54:00 UTC
Re: Kipware/Kentech-inc
stevenson_engineers
2003-11-01 12:15:05 UTC
Re: Kipware/Kentech-inc