Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Novice Timing Belt question
Posted by
John Johnson
on 2003-11-21 03:58:18 UTC
Here's a quick sketch of a third alternative:
http://homepage.mac.com/johnatl/PhotoAlbum23.html
Both motors are mounted to the frame, so the beam and head are very
light.
Regards,
JJ
http://homepage.mac.com/johnatl/PhotoAlbum23.html
Both motors are mounted to the frame, so the beam and head are very
light.
Regards,
JJ
On Friday, November 21, 2003, at 12:05 AM, robertokx wrote:
> I have pretty much given up on trying to economically source a ball
> screw for the long axis and am looking at timing belts.
>
> From the CNC machines on the web it appears that the most popular
> configuration to use is the fixed belt method ie "....the driving
> axis, idle rollers, and platform proceed as a unit along a length of
> belt that's held fast at both ends. Belt and drive sprocket impel the
> load while linear bearings support it"
>
> My question is why isnt the method where the belt is stretched around
> a driving and idler sprocket used more often? ie "....The driving
> pulley pulley and idler pulley of equal diameter are offset. The
> load is linked to the belt and moved parallel to the span between the
> pulleys. This system contains a platform or slider that moves on
> linear bearings"
>
> For diagrams of both systems see:
> http://apps.mectrol.com/applications/doc/linear_day2.pdf
>
> The reason I ask this question is that with the fixed belt method the
> weight associated with the motor, idler rollers etc must all make the
> trip around the table meaning bigger motors may be required, more
> inertia etc and also the fixed belt method appears to require more
> parts. I'm assuming that there are advantages of the fixed belt
> system over the closed belt which more than offset these
> disadvantages.
>
> Thanks for any responses, in advance.
>
> Robert
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...,
> timg@...
> Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... [Moderators]
> URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>
> OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
> aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach
> it if you have trouble.
> http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be
> a sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are
> there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
>
> NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING
> THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
> bill
> List Mom
> List Owner
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
Discussion Thread
robertokx
2003-11-20 21:05:41 UTC
Novice Timing Belt question
ballendo
2003-11-20 22:54:56 UTC
Re: Novice Timing Belt question
Les Newell
2003-11-21 01:10:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Novice Timing Belt question
John Johnson
2003-11-21 03:58:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Novice Timing Belt question
turbulatordude
2003-11-21 05:20:51 UTC
Re: Novice Timing Belt question - calculations
William Schmiedlin
2003-11-25 18:33:46 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Novice Timing Belt question
robertokx
2003-11-25 21:12:07 UTC
Re: Novice Timing Belt question - more questions