Re: Gantry Wood Router
Posted by
caudlet
on 2003-12-08 20:37:54 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "mij_gib" <mij_gib@y...>
wrote:
step and direction signals. You need separate control because one of
the main benefits of slaving is the ability to setup a home switch on
each side of your gantry and it will automatically "square" itself in
the even of any racking problems. The first side to hit a home stops
while the other continues until it hits the home.
All of that being said, you do NOT want to try and run two motors off
one motor driver. It puts the motors in parallel and the chances
that two motors will be absolutely identical in all aspects is
slight. Even with both motors tied mechanically to the same shaft
they will cause problems. Across a gantry it would be an even bigger
issue. Most modern motor drives have specific compensation based on
driving a single inductive load. Placing two in parallel upsets the
compensation. Even if you were to use the same step and direction
you still need separate motor drives for each motor (and then you
have to deal with the increased logic drive requirements on the
parallel port)
Driving a dual motor gantry works well and keeps things nice and
square even in heavy and rapid cutting.
wrote:
> I am designing a wood router using a gantry with a stepper motor onhooked
> each side in the "X" direction. My question is:
>
> Do I need a driver and controller for each one or can they be
> together?used
>
> Some software( MACH2) have a slave feature. Can this feature be
> without individual drivers and controllers?MACH 2 treats the slaved axis as a separate axis (A) that has its own
>
> Thank you
step and direction signals. You need separate control because one of
the main benefits of slaving is the ability to setup a home switch on
each side of your gantry and it will automatically "square" itself in
the even of any racking problems. The first side to hit a home stops
while the other continues until it hits the home.
All of that being said, you do NOT want to try and run two motors off
one motor driver. It puts the motors in parallel and the chances
that two motors will be absolutely identical in all aspects is
slight. Even with both motors tied mechanically to the same shaft
they will cause problems. Across a gantry it would be an even bigger
issue. Most modern motor drives have specific compensation based on
driving a single inductive load. Placing two in parallel upsets the
compensation. Even if you were to use the same step and direction
you still need separate motor drives for each motor (and then you
have to deal with the increased logic drive requirements on the
parallel port)
Driving a dual motor gantry works well and keeps things nice and
square even in heavy and rapid cutting.
Discussion Thread
mij_gib
2003-12-08 19:56:20 UTC
Gantry Wood Router
Robert Campbell
2003-12-08 20:17:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Gantry Wood Router
caudlet
2003-12-08 20:37:54 UTC
Re: Gantry Wood Router