Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Ecoder resolution terms
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2003-12-15 23:07:47 UTC
ballendo wrote:
it would be from the rising edge on the A channel to the next rising edge
on the same channel. That would give 4 COUNTS.
Most makers who use the horrible "Pulses/Rev" form mean the same as
CYCLES/Rev. So, a 200 line encoder would also mean 200 CYCLES/Rev
or 200 pulses/rev, as it will give 200 pulses on the A channel for a
complete
turn. (It also gives 200 pulses on B per turn.)
That is the standard way these terms are used, but some makers have used
these terms different ways. Many encoder manufacturers have slowly
moved to Cycles/rev as the definitive term, as it is pretty hard to
misunderstand this one. (Except when it is abbreviated to CPR, whoer
it could mean cycles or counts! UGHHHH!)
Jon
>Jon,A CYCLE is a definitive term, and when you look at it in quadrature,
>
>I thought pulses meant the "whole" square wave. Which means either 200
>(one channel) or 400(both channels)PPR for a 200 line encoder?
>
>
it would be from the rising edge on the A channel to the next rising edge
on the same channel. That would give 4 COUNTS.
Most makers who use the horrible "Pulses/Rev" form mean the same as
CYCLES/Rev. So, a 200 line encoder would also mean 200 CYCLES/Rev
or 200 pulses/rev, as it will give 200 pulses on the A channel for a
complete
turn. (It also gives 200 pulses on B per turn.)
That is the standard way these terms are used, but some makers have used
these terms different ways. Many encoder manufacturers have slowly
moved to Cycles/rev as the definitive term, as it is pretty hard to
misunderstand this one. (Except when it is abbreviated to CPR, whoer
it could mean cycles or counts! UGHHHH!)
Jon
Discussion Thread
Mina Aboul Saad
2003-12-15 02:27:56 UTC
Ecoder resolution terms
Jon Elson
2003-12-15 10:30:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Ecoder resolution terms
ballendo
2003-12-15 22:28:17 UTC
Re: Ecoder resolution terms
Jon Elson
2003-12-15 23:07:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Ecoder resolution terms
ballendo@y...
2003-12-16 04:10:03 UTC
Encoder 101 was Re: Ecoder resolution terms