Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] PIC DRO stupid question
Posted by
Marshall Pharoah
on 2000-04-07 05:22:29 UTC
While you have the positioning of 300 dpi, or more like 360/720/1440 with the Epson stylus,
you also have to take into account that the heads are moving with some small fluctuation due to
friction and motor speed variations, and also the size of the ink dot. The dot should bleed less on
Mylar then paper, but I expect it wouldn't be that good.
Marshall
you also have to take into account that the heads are moving with some small fluctuation due to
friction and motor speed variations, and also the size of the ink dot. The dot should bleed less on
Mylar then paper, but I expect it wouldn't be that good.
Marshall
----- Original Message -----
From: Wayne Bengtsson <wbbengtsson@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com>
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2000 5:21 AM
Subject: RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] PIC DRO stupid question
> One quick and easy way to make such a pattern would be to draw the pattern
> in a good CAD program, and print the pattern on to transparency material
> using the best quality injet printer you have access to.
>
> I am assuming a resolution of 300 DPI would translate into .003" accuracy,
> at a minimum. If anyone here has actually tested the output of a printer for
> accuracy, I would be very interested to see the numbers.
>
> Ok, that's the hard part done, how do you do the easy bits? :-)
>
> Best regards
> Wayne Bengtsson
>
>
>
>
Discussion Thread
mgrady
2000-04-05 17:24:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] PIC DRO stupid question
Jon Elson
2000-04-06 10:58:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] PIC DRO stupid question
Wayne Bengtsson
2000-04-07 02:21:35 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] PIC DRO stupid question
Marshall Pharoah
2000-04-07 05:22:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] PIC DRO stupid question
David Howland
2000-04-07 11:47:22 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] PIC DRO stupid question
Jon Elson
2000-04-07 13:01:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] PIC DRO stupid question