Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Poor man DRO
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2003-12-17 10:09:24 UTC
dvls333@... wrote:
They get close, but under certain conditions, the mouse chip either
fails to send every movement, or the driver software is not able to
decipher it. Are you sure your encode5 program is decoding the
mouse packets correctly?
Jon
>Sometime ago i have find a site with the subject of making a DROMouse drivers do not guarantee precise registration of movement.
>using a mouse and software (encode5) for dos.
>After some testing it seems to be ok, and i start to built some
>gearing mechanism to give me 0,1 mm accuracy (divide that with the
>quadrature sensors final res was 0,025mm.
>but after instalation the y axis worked fine the x axis sometimes
>worked sometimes not,i have test 6 different mouse and i get more
>wierd results if i turn the handwheel fast is accurate but if i turn
>it slow it misses.Any suggestions?
>I have solder the sensors with a 25 cm cable from the original pcb,
>the cable is from a mouse, i made the encoder wheels but to the same
>dimensions as the smaller one found in a mouse.
>I have aligned the sensors perfectly.
>
>
They get close, but under certain conditions, the mouse chip either
fails to send every movement, or the driver software is not able to
decipher it. Are you sure your encode5 program is decoding the
mouse packets correctly?
Jon
Discussion Thread
dvls333@y...
2003-12-17 06:58:06 UTC
Poor man DRO
luvindaddy@y...
2003-12-17 07:25:16 UTC
Re: Poor man DRO
Jon Elson
2003-12-17 10:09:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Poor man DRO
tecnoconsult@t...
2003-12-17 11:59:36 UTC
Re: Poor man DRO