Re: Gecko / motor compatability
Posted by
Mariss Freimanis
on 2003-12-23 12:20:20 UTC
Ken,
Not particulary powerful. 1.9A times 48V times 80% eff (guessing) =
73W mechanical. 51.5 in-oz max continuous torque at 1877 RPM, Stall
torque of 298 in-oz (momentary). For best performance gear the motor
so it turns about 1877 RPM when your mechanism is moving at its max
target speed.
Mariss
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Kenneth Cardolino"
<kdntool@c...> wrote:
Not particulary powerful. 1.9A times 48V times 80% eff (guessing) =
73W mechanical. 51.5 in-oz max continuous torque at 1877 RPM, Stall
torque of 298 in-oz (momentary). For best performance gear the motor
so it turns about 1877 RPM when your mechanism is moving at its max
target speed.
Mariss
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Kenneth Cardolino"
<kdntool@c...> wrote:
> Good day to everyone.
>
> Given the following motor specs and say a 48V supply, does this
> motor sound like a good combo with a Gecko 320?
>
> Torque constant = 27.1 ozin/amp
> Voltage constant = 20 v/krpm
> Arm. Resistance = 5.5 ohms
> Peak Current = 11 amps
> Cont. Current = 1.9 amps
>
> Thanks for your input
> Ken
Discussion Thread
Kenneth Cardolino
2003-12-23 10:29:04 UTC
Gecko / motor compatability
Jon Elson
2003-12-23 11:14:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Gecko / motor compatability
Kenneth Cardolino
2003-12-23 11:49:06 UTC
Re: Gecko / motor compatability
Mariss Freimanis
2003-12-23 12:20:20 UTC
Re: Gecko / motor compatability
Gregory Kamysz
2003-12-24 15:30:21 UTC
Encoders
onecooltoolfool
2003-12-24 17:35:03 UTC
Re: Encoders
Torsten
2003-12-24 18:21:38 UTC
Re: Encoders