Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] USC of Jon Elson
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2004-03-14 16:00:43 UTC
alex wrote:
it should work OK.
interrupts to operate things on the motherboard that steal time from the
CNC task.
Jon
>Can't I get away with one loop in a case of low speed and lowOh sure, for testing purposes. If you keep it under 50 full steps a second
>intrtial load? This would be nice at least for
>hardware testing. Then I could build on it...
>
it should work OK.
>Yup, works fine on most systems, but be aware that laptops may have secret
>
>
>>This all assumes you are talking about using my board. If not, you
>>really have to do all the same stuff, but you have to generate the train
>>of step pulses, too.
>>
>>
>>
>This is good - no pilse train!
>
>
>
>> You really need a real time system, or to be totally
>>sure that there are no OS routines that will steal time from your loops
>>to make your step pulses have timing jitter.
>>
>>
>>
>Dos is cheap enough for me!
>
>
interrupts to operate things on the motherboard that steal time from the
CNC task.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Jon Elson
2004-03-13 13:58:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] USC of Jon Elson
alex
2004-03-14 13:23:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] USC of Jon Elson
alex
2004-03-14 13:32:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] USC of Jon Elson
Jon Elson
2004-03-14 16:00:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] USC of Jon Elson
alex
2004-03-15 08:10:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] USC of Jon Elson