CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] USC of Jon Elson

Posted by Jon Elson
on 2004-03-14 16:00:43 UTC
alex wrote:

>Can't I get away with one loop in a case of low speed and low
>intrtial load? This would be nice at least for
>hardware testing. Then I could build on it...
>
Oh sure, for testing purposes. If you keep it under 50 full steps a second
it should work OK.

>
>
>
>>This all assumes you are talking about using my board. If not, you
>>really have to do all the same stuff, but you have to generate the train
>>of step pulses, too.
>>
>>
>>
>This is good - no pilse train!
>
>
>
>> You really need a real time system, or to be totally
>>sure that there are no OS routines that will steal time from your loops
>>to make your step pulses have timing jitter.
>>
>>
>>
>Dos is cheap enough for me!
>
>
Yup, works fine on most systems, but be aware that laptops may have secret
interrupts to operate things on the motherboard that steal time from the
CNC task.

Jon

Discussion Thread

Jon Elson 2004-03-13 13:58:07 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] USC of Jon Elson alex 2004-03-14 13:23:17 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] USC of Jon Elson alex 2004-03-14 13:32:11 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] USC of Jon Elson Jon Elson 2004-03-14 16:00:43 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] USC of Jon Elson alex 2004-03-15 08:10:14 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] USC of Jon Elson