Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: How do I interpret accuracy
Posted by
Roy J. Tellason
on 2004-03-26 09:58:05 UTC
On Friday 26 March 2004 03:28 am, ballendo wrote:
This ties in with the trend in recent years toward presenting information in a
"digital" way rather than in the old "analog" way, with meters and such
stuff. Just because there are a bunch of digits there doesn't mean squat
about them having any particular significance. But people tend to assume
that this is the case!
> The accuracy figures quoted in this hobby/desktop CNC market are notAn excellent point!
> even close to correct. What you often see called "accuracy" is REALLY
> just the machine's RESOLUTION. And resolution IS NOT accuracy!
This ties in with the trend in recent years toward presenting information in a
"digital" way rather than in the old "analog" way, with meters and such
stuff. Just because there are a bunch of digits there doesn't mean squat
about them having any particular significance. But people tend to assume
that this is the case!
Discussion Thread
khalique_rehman
2004-03-25 20:27:25 UTC
How do I interpret accuracy
Jon Elson
2004-03-25 22:14:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] How do I interpret accuracy
ballendo
2004-03-26 06:00:54 UTC
Re: How do I interpret accuracy
Roy J. Tellason
2004-03-26 09:58:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: How do I interpret accuracy
Tony Jeffree
2004-03-27 00:52:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: How do I interpret accuracy