Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground? opto to parallel
Posted by
turbulatordude
on 2004-04-08 18:34:47 UTC
> An opto goes not have current gain so you will not get anybuffering
> from using one. If signal levels or drive are an issue, bufferingof
> on one side or the other (or both) is required. You can get level
> translation, for example where the input is 3.3V like some of the
> new parallel ports. If the source will supply the required current
> then the output can be referenced to any voltage within the specs
> the opto transistor. Since optos are current devices and require aI am looking at an external power supply thru a resostor on the
> relative large amount of current with less than unity gain, they
> exhibit a level of noise immunity that a high impedence input does
> not.
>
isolated side of the opto. I can drive the LED with 10-15mA and
attain isolation from the opto as the power supply and resistors and
LED side of the optos would be on a totally seperate circuit.
On the parallel port side, It would appear that a non-buffered
connection would have the port pins (10-13) connected to the opto and
the other side to ground.
A state change of the inputs would result in a state change of the
outputs.
Would a pull-up or pull-down on the parallel port side offer any
benifits ? and which would be best for the parallel port side of
things ?
Dave
Discussion Thread
ghidera2000
2004-04-07 10:56:29 UTC
ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground?
Roy J. Tellason
2004-04-07 13:11:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground?
caudlet
2004-04-07 13:27:09 UTC
Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground?
ibewgypsie
2004-04-07 13:36:59 UTC
Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground?
ghidera2000
2004-04-07 19:45:40 UTC
Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground?
JanRwl@A...
2004-04-07 21:02:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground?
turbulatordude
2004-04-07 23:47:46 UTC
Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground?
caudlet
2004-04-08 05:37:11 UTC
Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground?
caudlet
2004-04-08 05:50:11 UTC
Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground?
ghidera2000
2004-04-08 08:14:58 UTC
Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground?
ghidera2000
2004-04-08 08:21:06 UTC
Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground?
Jon Elson
2004-04-08 10:13:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground?
turbulatordude
2004-04-08 14:03:18 UTC
Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground?
caudlet
2004-04-08 17:21:36 UTC
Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground?
turbulatordude
2004-04-08 18:34:47 UTC
Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground? opto to parallel
Roy J. Tellason
2004-04-08 19:13:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground? opto to parallel
afogassa
2004-04-08 20:34:24 UTC
Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground?
Harvey White
2004-04-08 22:11:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground?
JanRwl@A...
2004-04-08 22:44:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground? opto to parallel
turbulatordude
2004-04-08 22:46:19 UTC
Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground? - file section
JanRwl@A...
2004-04-08 22:59:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground?
caudlet
2004-04-09 06:56:58 UTC
Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground? opto to parallel
turbulatordude
2004-04-09 07:45:08 UTC
Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground? opto to parallel
ghidera2000
2004-04-09 08:15:45 UTC
Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground? opto to parallel
caudlet
2004-04-09 12:03:07 UTC
Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground? opto to parallel
turbulatordude
2004-04-09 19:02:53 UTC
Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground? opto to parallel
ghidera2000
2004-04-09 19:15:30 UTC
Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground? opto to parallel