CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground? opto to parallel

on 2004-04-08 18:34:47 UTC
> An opto goes not have current gain so you will not get any
buffering
> from using one. If signal levels or drive are an issue, buffering
> on one side or the other (or both) is required. You can get level
> translation, for example where the input is 3.3V like some of the
> new parallel ports. If the source will supply the required current
> then the output can be referenced to any voltage within the specs
of
> the opto transistor. Since optos are current devices and require a
> relative large amount of current with less than unity gain, they
> exhibit a level of noise immunity that a high impedence input does
> not.
>

I am looking at an external power supply thru a resostor on the
isolated side of the opto. I can drive the LED with 10-15mA and
attain isolation from the opto as the power supply and resistors and
LED side of the optos would be on a totally seperate circuit.

On the parallel port side, It would appear that a non-buffered
connection would have the port pins (10-13) connected to the opto and
the other side to ground.

A state change of the inputs would result in a state change of the
outputs.

Would a pull-up or pull-down on the parallel port side offer any
benifits ? and which would be best for the parallel port side of
things ?

Dave

Discussion Thread

ghidera2000 2004-04-07 10:56:29 UTC ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground? Roy J. Tellason 2004-04-07 13:11:56 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground? caudlet 2004-04-07 13:27:09 UTC Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground? ibewgypsie 2004-04-07 13:36:59 UTC Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground? ghidera2000 2004-04-07 19:45:40 UTC Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground? JanRwl@A... 2004-04-07 21:02:58 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground? turbulatordude 2004-04-07 23:47:46 UTC Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground? caudlet 2004-04-08 05:37:11 UTC Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground? caudlet 2004-04-08 05:50:11 UTC Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground? ghidera2000 2004-04-08 08:14:58 UTC Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground? ghidera2000 2004-04-08 08:21:06 UTC Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground? Jon Elson 2004-04-08 10:13:29 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground? turbulatordude 2004-04-08 14:03:18 UTC Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground? caudlet 2004-04-08 17:21:36 UTC Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground? turbulatordude 2004-04-08 18:34:47 UTC Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground? opto to parallel Roy J. Tellason 2004-04-08 19:13:14 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground? opto to parallel afogassa 2004-04-08 20:34:24 UTC Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground? Harvey White 2004-04-08 22:11:04 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground? JanRwl@A... 2004-04-08 22:44:11 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground? opto to parallel turbulatordude 2004-04-08 22:46:19 UTC Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground? - file section JanRwl@A... 2004-04-08 22:59:19 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground? caudlet 2004-04-09 06:56:58 UTC Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground? opto to parallel turbulatordude 2004-04-09 07:45:08 UTC Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground? opto to parallel ghidera2000 2004-04-09 08:15:45 UTC Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground? opto to parallel caudlet 2004-04-09 12:03:07 UTC Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground? opto to parallel turbulatordude 2004-04-09 19:02:53 UTC Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground? opto to parallel ghidera2000 2004-04-09 19:15:30 UTC Re: ParPort output low - hi-Z or ground? opto to parallel