Allegro 3977 with separate H bridge
Posted by
jc56au
on 2004-04-09 17:07:59 UTC
In looking at stepper drivers for a variety of (unpurchased but one
of
the cheap alternatives is 4A) motors, I was discussing various
alternatives with one of the engineers at work who has had a fair bit
of experience with high power switchmode supplies.
One suggestion was to use the Allegro 3977 chip with the outlets
driving a separate H bridge (via some simple logic) and using the
sense inputs (with appropriate resistors/capacitors) to give the
current control.
Is this a suitable method for getting the advantages of this type of
PWM control with minimum development effort. Obvious possible
problems
relate to RFI feedback and general messing around with something I
have only a limited theorectical knowledge of.
of
the cheap alternatives is 4A) motors, I was discussing various
alternatives with one of the engineers at work who has had a fair bit
of experience with high power switchmode supplies.
One suggestion was to use the Allegro 3977 chip with the outlets
driving a separate H bridge (via some simple logic) and using the
sense inputs (with appropriate resistors/capacitors) to give the
current control.
Is this a suitable method for getting the advantages of this type of
PWM control with minimum development effort. Obvious possible
problems
relate to RFI feedback and general messing around with something I
have only a limited theorectical knowledge of.
Discussion Thread
jc56au
2004-04-09 17:07:59 UTC
Allegro 3977 with separate H bridge
ghidera2000
2004-04-10 18:58:16 UTC
Re: Allegro 3977 with separate H bridge
caudlet
2004-04-10 20:35:22 UTC
Re: Allegro 3977 with separate H bridge
caudlet
2004-04-10 20:45:37 UTC
Re: Allegro 3977 -correction on previous post