Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Noob needs advice on retrofit
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2004-05-13 17:55:03 UTC
andy_paul_2000 wrote:
that the light construction of the machine ways, it works quite well.
to these systems, but you can't beat the price. For a little bit more
money,
you can have encoder feedback to the computer, and that gives several
advantages. One, you can't ever "lose steps" without knowing about it.
Two, you can evaluate following error and make decisions on what feedrates
give acceptable accuracy. Three, you can optimize the control loop to
obtain the minimum error. Four, you can switch between manual and CNC,
and use the CNC program like a DRO when in manual mode.
about
anything that doesn't work under Windows, then it might be better for you
to go with Mach2. If you want to get into the guts and change stuff, then
EMC is about as good as it gets (open source).
"bulletproof",
but work well in most systems. But, the standard Gecko setup is not closed
loop, by that I mean, no position feedback to the computer.
Jon
>I would like to get started on my CNC retrofit. I had a servo cncWhat size? I have done a servo conversion on the 150 Lb minimill, and other
>system in the past that was by flashcut on a small Sherline mill.
>Overall it worked great but was a little small for what I was doing.
>I now have a chinese mini mill that I would like to do a conversion
>on.
>
that the light construction of the machine ways, it works quite well.
> I do have a good idea how CNC works, difference between servo andSoftware step pulses and no position feedback to the computer are a drawback
>stepper, etc etc, but the flashcut system was "plug and play" if you
>will. Can someone push me in the right direction as far as choosing a
>setup as far as motors, drivers etc, and how to interface all of this
>together. From what I understand you can use software alone to drive
>the motors directly from a windows PC. Is this the way I need to go?
>
to these systems, but you can't beat the price. For a little bit more
money,
you can have encoder feedback to the computer, and that gives several
advantages. One, you can't ever "lose steps" without knowing about it.
Two, you can evaluate following error and make decisions on what feedrates
give acceptable accuracy. Three, you can optimize the control loop to
obtain the minimum error. Four, you can switch between manual and CNC,
and use the CNC program like a DRO when in manual mode.
>I do have BobCad software that I would like to utilize as well. AllIf Linux doesn't scare you, then definitely. If you have a total phobia
>in all I would prefer to keep this project under $1000 if at all
>possible. I need 3 possibly 4 axis of control, most G-code functions,
>interpolation etc.
>
>Is "EMC" a decent way to go?
>
about
anything that doesn't work under Windows, then it might be better for you
to go with Mach2. If you want to get into the guts and change stuff, then
EMC is about as good as it gets (open source).
>I have seen "gecko drives" mentioned, are these good products? theyGecko makes a good product, and the price is right. They are not
>are very cheap
>
>
"bulletproof",
but work well in most systems. But, the standard Gecko setup is not closed
loop, by that I mean, no position feedback to the computer.
Jon
Discussion Thread
andy_paul_2000
2004-05-13 12:45:02 UTC
Noob needs advice on retrofit
Jon Elson
2004-05-13 17:55:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Noob needs advice on retrofit