Re: robotic workcell design
Posted by
skykotech
on 2004-07-10 14:00:32 UTC
The main reason I suggested linear rails and carriages is because you
can bolt them directly to the extrusion for a very easy motion
solution. My shizuoka uses box ways...I don't see how box ways could
be cheaper than linear rails/carriages. Also, with box ways, if you
lose lubrication things get nasty pretty fast. When I visualized
this gantry, I pictured something that could be transported by two
individuals and did not require a lubrication pump :-)
The dead cheapest solution would be 3/4" ground shafting (about $15 a
foot from MSC) and Thomson Frelon 3/4" bearings (about $11 each).
Those bearings don't require lubrication and can actually operate
with *heavier* loads than the ball bearing type. They are maybe not
as accurate as the ball bearing type. Things get much harder if you
want to support the shaft. I was amazed at how much an unsupported
18" section of solid 3/4 inch shafting deflects when force is applied
in the center. Still, for a light duty machine, maybe?
I would not mind coming up with a 3 axis servo controller that
plugged into a PCI slot. There are very nice PCI bridge chips out
there now, and there is even a $199 card with a bridge and FPGA that
includes a core for a servo controller. The problem is that it would
be a lot of work and worthy of a series of articles by itself. :-)
I hate steppers, but maybe for a first run...
Circuit Cellar is another decent magazine that might be interested in
this type of article.
Rick
can bolt them directly to the extrusion for a very easy motion
solution. My shizuoka uses box ways...I don't see how box ways could
be cheaper than linear rails/carriages. Also, with box ways, if you
lose lubrication things get nasty pretty fast. When I visualized
this gantry, I pictured something that could be transported by two
individuals and did not require a lubrication pump :-)
The dead cheapest solution would be 3/4" ground shafting (about $15 a
foot from MSC) and Thomson Frelon 3/4" bearings (about $11 each).
Those bearings don't require lubrication and can actually operate
with *heavier* loads than the ball bearing type. They are maybe not
as accurate as the ball bearing type. Things get much harder if you
want to support the shaft. I was amazed at how much an unsupported
18" section of solid 3/4 inch shafting deflects when force is applied
in the center. Still, for a light duty machine, maybe?
I would not mind coming up with a 3 axis servo controller that
plugged into a PCI slot. There are very nice PCI bridge chips out
there now, and there is even a $199 card with a bridge and FPGA that
includes a core for a servo controller. The problem is that it would
be a lot of work and worthy of a series of articles by itself. :-)
I hate steppers, but maybe for a first run...
Circuit Cellar is another decent magazine that might be interested in
this type of article.
Rick
Discussion Thread
skykotech
2004-07-09 09:56:06 UTC
robotic workcell design
skykotech
2004-07-09 10:22:49 UTC
Re: robotic workcell design
David A. Frantz
2004-07-09 12:13:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: robotic workcell design
David A. Frantz
2004-07-09 13:05:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] robotic workcell design
skykotech
2004-07-09 13:44:32 UTC
Re: robotic workcell design
David A. Frantz
2004-07-10 00:45:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: robotic workcell design
skykotech
2004-07-10 09:35:46 UTC
Re: robotic workcell design
skykotech
2004-07-10 11:00:33 UTC
Re: robotic workcell design
David A. Frantz
2004-07-10 11:59:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: robotic workcell design
skykotech
2004-07-10 14:00:32 UTC
Re: robotic workcell design
Fred Smith
2004-07-10 19:14:13 UTC
Re: robotic workcell design
David A. Frantz
2004-07-11 01:21:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: robotic workcell design