RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long!
    Posted by
    
      Pete Jarman
    
  
  
    on 2000-05-03 13:02:41 UTC
  
  Ron wrote:
<The only way to make a decent CPNC system with a windows GUI is to use a
<separate motion controller box to handle the real time stuff. We had
<some discussions here a few weeks ago about developing such a box, but
<that died.
Is there any way that the motion controller box could be an outdated x86 PC
with an interface card running a real time programme under either DOS or
linux? The software would handle incoming commands and report status through
the serial port to the controlling PC running the GUI and the conversational
programming software.
Pete Jarman
North of Bedford, England
<The only way to make a decent CPNC system with a windows GUI is to use a
<separate motion controller box to handle the real time stuff. We had
<some discussions here a few weeks ago about developing such a box, but
<that died.
Is there any way that the motion controller box could be an outdated x86 PC
with an interface card running a real time programme under either DOS or
linux? The software would handle incoming commands and report status through
the serial port to the controlling PC running the GUI and the conversational
programming software.
Pete Jarman
North of Bedford, England
Discussion Thread
  
    Ron Ginger
  
2000-05-03 07:51:59 UTC
  Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long!
  
    snapscottc@y...
  
2000-05-03 10:38:14 UTC
  Re:  Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long!
  
    Carlos Guillermo
  
2000-05-03 11:16:15 UTC
  RE: CPNC and the BOX
  
    Pete Jarman
  
2000-05-03 13:02:41 UTC
  RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long!
  
    James Eckman
  
2000-05-04 07:14:27 UTC
  RE: Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long!
  
    Ray Henry
  
2000-05-04 11:23:46 UTC
  Re: Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long!