RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long!
Posted by
Pete Jarman
on 2000-05-03 13:02:41 UTC
Ron wrote:
<The only way to make a decent CPNC system with a windows GUI is to use a
<separate motion controller box to handle the real time stuff. We had
<some discussions here a few weeks ago about developing such a box, but
<that died.
Is there any way that the motion controller box could be an outdated x86 PC
with an interface card running a real time programme under either DOS or
linux? The software would handle incoming commands and report status through
the serial port to the controlling PC running the GUI and the conversational
programming software.
Pete Jarman
North of Bedford, England
<The only way to make a decent CPNC system with a windows GUI is to use a
<separate motion controller box to handle the real time stuff. We had
<some discussions here a few weeks ago about developing such a box, but
<that died.
Is there any way that the motion controller box could be an outdated x86 PC
with an interface card running a real time programme under either DOS or
linux? The software would handle incoming commands and report status through
the serial port to the controlling PC running the GUI and the conversational
programming software.
Pete Jarman
North of Bedford, England
Discussion Thread
Ron Ginger
2000-05-03 07:51:59 UTC
Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long!
snapscottc@y...
2000-05-03 10:38:14 UTC
Re: Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long!
Carlos Guillermo
2000-05-03 11:16:15 UTC
RE: CPNC and the BOX
Pete Jarman
2000-05-03 13:02:41 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long!
James Eckman
2000-05-04 07:14:27 UTC
RE: Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long!
Ray Henry
2000-05-04 11:23:46 UTC
Re: Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long!