CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: tool changer logic- mathematical challenge

Posted by Jeff Jones
on 2004-08-13 12:59:54 UTC
> Cheating huh?
> Well, you are right. It's hard to describe this in words. You
> see what I'm saying though.
>
> Again, this is an existing setup, an Emco Turn 120 lathe. I have
> no clue why they built it this way, but that's what they've done.
> I'm really hoping to get it working as is. It's a small assembly,
> that would be very difficult to add microswitches or even an encoder
> to without major rework.
>
> My problem now is how to implement the logic. With another $130
> breakout board and a $10 PCI parallel port card, I 'might' have
> enough inputs to do it. Then I need to pull out some magic VBscript
> for a tool change macro in Mach2. However, I still don't know if I
> will need 4 inputs (action when going LO and HI) or 8 inputs (4 LO
> active and 4 HI active).

Am I missing something? Seems pretty simple to me. I think.

Assuming the opeing in the "C" is about 90 degrees (maybe a skosh more
to allow for the lamp width) every 45 degrees would have a unique value
at the sensors. At any one time either one or two sensors would be
illuminated and the other 2 or 3 will not be. It's a fairly simple
table-driven matter to map that pattern to tool numbers 0-7. A PIC would
do the trick quite nicely.

Jeff

Discussion Thread

Lance Hopper 2004-08-12 07:21:27 UTC tool changer logic- mathematical challenge cnc002@a... 2004-08-12 07:37:12 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] tool changer logic- mathematical challenge Bob McKnight 2004-08-12 07:38:43 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] tool changer logic- mathematical challenge Lance Hopper 2004-08-12 08:07:33 UTC Re: tool changer logic- mathematical challenge Lance Hopper 2004-08-12 08:09:32 UTC Re: tool changer logic- mathematical challenge cnc002@a... 2004-08-12 08:27:21 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: tool changer logic- mathematical challenge Lance Hopper 2004-08-12 08:49:32 UTC Re: tool changer logic- mathematical challenge industrialhobbies 2004-08-13 01:04:24 UTC Re: tool changer logic- mathematical challenge Lance Hopper 2004-08-13 05:23:55 UTC Re: tool changer logic- mathematical challenge industrialhobbies 2004-08-13 08:52:39 UTC Re: tool changer logic- mathematical challenge Lance Hopper 2004-08-13 12:16:35 UTC Re: tool changer logic- mathematical challenge andyolney 2004-08-13 12:23:30 UTC Re: tool changer logic- mathematical challenge Stephen Wille Padnos 2004-08-13 12:43:22 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: tool changer logic- mathematical challenge Jeff Jones 2004-08-13 12:59:54 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: tool changer logic- mathematical challenge Stephen Wille Padnos 2004-08-13 13:14:26 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: tool changer logic- mathematical challenge Jeff Jones 2004-08-13 14:05:10 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: tool changer logic- mathematical challenge Jeff Jones 2004-08-13 14:20:07 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: tool changer logic- mathematical challenge Lance Hopper 2004-08-13 14:21:09 UTC Re: tool changer logic- mathematical challenge Lance Hopper 2004-08-13 14:36:19 UTC Re: tool changer logic- mathematical challenge Stephen Wille Padnos 2004-08-13 15:03:38 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: tool changer logic- mathematical challenge Jeff Jones 2004-08-13 15:23:28 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: tool changer logic- mathematical challenge Graham Stabler 2004-08-13 16:22:26 UTC Re: tool changer logic- mathematical challenge Larry Wright 2004-08-13 17:42:57 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: tool changer logic- mathematical challenge Lance Hopper 2004-08-14 08:27:37 UTC Re: tool changer logic- mathematical challenge Graham Stabler 2004-08-14 15:52:27 UTC Re: tool changer logic- mathematical challenge Tom Hubin 2004-08-15 16:13:08 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: tool changer logic- mathematical challenge Stan Aarhus 2004-08-15 16:28:26 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: tool changer logic- mathematical challenge