CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long!

Posted by Darrell
on 2000-05-05 00:07:27 UTC
I don't think he was using the Bridgeport drivers.
Darrell

----- Original Message -----
From: Tim Goldstein <timg@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2000 3:36 PM
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversational Programming and NAMES- very
long!


> Interesting...
>
> When I talked to Matt Shaver about his Bridgeport conversion he said he
was
> able to get 60 ipm if I remember correctly. Makes you wonder why he
managed
> 3X the speed you are getting??
>
> Tim
> [Denver, CO]
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Darrell <dgehlsen@...>
> To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2000 4:09 PM
> Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversational Programming and NAMES- very
> long!
>
>
> > Tim,
> > I am running an AMD K6 II 400 and only require 2000 steps per inch. I am
> > running freqmod Feb 29 I believe. When I tried it on my Bridgeport,
> movement
> > started getting ratty at 15 IPM and maxed out at 20 IPM. Looking at the
> > pulse train with a scope, pulse jitter (timing between steps) got worse
up
> > to 20 IPM and then smoothed out to near perfect at 30 IPM and then
started
> > going bad again. At 20 IPM the pulse train was varying by as much as
3/4s
> of
> > the signal width. I talked to Fred Proctor and he agreed that timing in
> EMC
> > was the problem.
> > Using micro stepping and small motors would probably let you move much
> > faster but with 1100 oz in motors and full stepping on the Bridgeport it
> > requires a clean signal. I am used to getting 120 IPM.
> > I have used the Microkinetics 8010 drivers with good success and I think
> the
> > problems that users have been having on this group is directly related
to
> > the poor step signal timing.
> > Darrell
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> You have a voice mail message waiting for you at iHello.com:
> http://click.egroups.com/1/3555/2/_/423600/_/957479669/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...,an unmoderated list for the
discussion of shop built systems, for CAD, CAM, EDM, and DRO.
>
> Addresses:
> Post message: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@egroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@egroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@egroups.com, wanliker@...
> Moderator: jmelson@... [Moderator]
> URL to this page: http://www.egroups.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> bill,
> List Manager
>
>

Discussion Thread

james owens 2000-05-03 09:25:11 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long! Paul Devey 2000-05-03 17:10:47 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long! Jon Elson 2000-05-03 20:50:09 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long! bfp 2000-05-03 21:25:48 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long! Darrell 2000-05-04 10:54:52 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long! Tim Goldstein 2000-05-04 12:03:48 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long! Darrell 2000-05-04 15:07:14 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long! Tim Goldstein 2000-05-04 15:34:29 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long! Matt Shaver 2000-05-04 16:56:21 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long! Carlos Guillermo 2000-05-04 17:51:06 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long! Matt Shaver 2000-05-04 18:23:39 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long! paul@a... 2000-05-04 18:23:52 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long! lawrence jackman 2000-05-04 21:13:50 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long! Jon Elson 2000-05-04 22:20:01 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long! Darrell 2000-05-05 00:07:27 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long! wanliker@a... 2000-05-06 10:22:23 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long!