CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long!

Posted by Darrell
on 2000-05-04 10:54:52 UTC
Jon, What you say may be true for servo but not for steppers. To make
steppers work properly we need something past the Linux box to create smooth
step pulses. The problem with EMC and steppers now is that the pulse train
is ragged and you reach a point at about 20 IPM where the jitter on the
pulse train exceeds the instantaneous move capability of the stepper motor
and it stalls.
Darrell

----- Original Message -----
From: Jon Elson <jmelson@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 03, 1998 8:52 PM
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversational Programming and NAMES- very
long!


>
>
> Pete Jarman wrote:
>
> > Ron wrote:
> >
> > <The only way to make a decent CPNC system with a windows GUI is to
> > use a
> > <separate motion controller box to handle the real time stuff. We had
> > <some discussions here a few weeks ago about developing such a box,
> > but
> > <that died.
> >
> > Is there any way that the motion controller box could be an outdated
> > x86 PC
> > with an interface card running a real time programme under either DOS
> > or
> > linux? The software would handle incoming commands and report status
> > through
> > the serial port to the controlling PC running the GUI and the
> > conversational
> > programming software.
>
> Yes, in theory, a DOS program that makes no system calls, and has no TSR
> programs that
> might grab control away will be allowed to run unimpeded, and can
> achieve real time
> performance. The serial port might be a bit slow for this. But, if you
> are throwing Linux
> into the equation, who needs any extra computers? They just make
> debugging that much
> more of a hassle. If you will be using Linux, put everything on it, the
> real-time motion
> control will make sure it has adequate time to process the motion, and
> the rest is left
> to the user's various tasks. I do this now, and pretty fearlessly edit
> programs while the
> machine is running others. (The only problem is that while you are in
> another window,
> you lose keyoard and mouse focus to the machining task, so the only
> emergency
> control is the E-stop button, which is a bit drastic. Nothing like
> trying to switch focus
> with the mouse when a crash is 1/2 second away!)
>
> Jon
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Get your money connected @ OnMoney.com - the first Web site that lets
> you see and manage all of your finances all in one place.
> http://click.egroups.com/1/3012/2/_/423600/_/957412209/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...,an unmoderated list for the
discussion of shop built systems, for CAD, CAM, EDM, and DRO.
>
> Addresses:
> Post message: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@egroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@egroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@egroups.com, wanliker@...
> Moderator: jmelson@... [Moderator]
> URL to this page: http://www.egroups.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> bill,
> List Manager
>
>

Discussion Thread

james owens 2000-05-03 09:25:11 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long! Paul Devey 2000-05-03 17:10:47 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long! Jon Elson 2000-05-03 20:50:09 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long! bfp 2000-05-03 21:25:48 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long! Darrell 2000-05-04 10:54:52 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long! Tim Goldstein 2000-05-04 12:03:48 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long! Darrell 2000-05-04 15:07:14 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long! Tim Goldstein 2000-05-04 15:34:29 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long! Matt Shaver 2000-05-04 16:56:21 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long! Carlos Guillermo 2000-05-04 17:51:06 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long! Matt Shaver 2000-05-04 18:23:39 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long! paul@a... 2000-05-04 18:23:52 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long! lawrence jackman 2000-05-04 21:13:50 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long! Jon Elson 2000-05-04 22:20:01 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long! Darrell 2000-05-05 00:07:27 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long! wanliker@a... 2000-05-06 10:22:23 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Conversational Programming and NAMES- very long!