Re: Backlash problem? - Solved
Posted by
kdoney_63021
on 2004-09-17 07:09:32 UTC
Art (of Mach2 fame) suggested I not use the multiplier on the Gecko
G210. I took his suggestion and it worked. I also removed the pll
from another G210 and it also worked. Art said that this error had
been reported to him before. It was something about the quick change
of direction?
Kevin
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, R Rogers <rogersmach@y...>
wrote:
set the handwheels on zero and it returns to the exact same position
every time. There must be something wrong with the machine. It isn't
Mach2 or a programming error.
X0Y0 it should return to the same spot every time.
move to go back to the starting point. Never use Incremental.
your commands are in Incremental then it goes back to absolute??.
to a certain place in the machining process that inducing a heavy
load on the axis drive.
it if you have trouble.
there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
G210. I took his suggestion and it worked. I also removed the pll
from another G210 and it also worked. Art said that this error had
been reported to him before. It was something about the quick change
of direction?
Kevin
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, R Rogers <rogersmach@y...>
wrote:
> As I wrote yesterday, I intended to run the program today when Igot a chance as the original poster presented and it works perfect. I
set the handwheels on zero and it returns to the exact same position
every time. There must be something wrong with the machine. It isn't
Mach2 or a programming error.
>irrelevant what moves you make when you tell the machine to return to
> Ron
>
> Tom Hubin <thubin@e...> wrote:
>
> > Well, You are in absolute per the G90 command. So it is
X0Y0 it should return to the same spot every time.
>repitition is in Incremental G91 programming and miscalculating the
> Agreed.
>
> > The only time you can build program end position errors on
move to go back to the starting point. Never use Incremental.
>switch
> As far as what you say about incremental and absolute, you can
> back and forth as often as you wish. If you start in absolute at(0,0)
> and end in absolute at (0,0) then you should end up where youstarted
> with no accumulated error. As you suggest, you cannot accuratelymove
> incrementally to a calculated position.system,
>
> The thing that can mess you up is if you change your coordinate
> using G92 for example, then you effectively redefine x0y0 assomeplace
> new. I do not see that anywhere in the poster's short program sothat is
> clearly not the problem.produced that code exactly like that? You start out in Absolute but
>
> > However, I'm looking at the code more closely. Are you sure Mach2
your commands are in Incremental then it goes back to absolute??.
>it
> I don't see anyplace where G91 sets up incremental mode. As it sits
> is all in absolute mode.values.
>
> > In absolute the radii are always called out with "I" and "J"
>less
> Not true. I often use X, Y, and R in absolute mode. The arc must be
> than a semicircle to use R reliably. For arcs greater than asemicircle
> you need to use I, J to specify center and not R to specify radius.the
>
> In some Gcode interpreters I and J are always incremental values. In
> other interpreters I and J are absolute or incremental according to
> G90, G91 mode in effect. In still other interpreters, the userchooses
> from a menu to interpret I and J as incremental or absolute. I thinkthe
> Mach2 allows the user to choose. But there are no I and J values in
> poster's Gcode program so this should be academic.possible encoder/motor lead cross-talking. It could be lost steps due
>
> > If thats not it and you are using servos I'd be looking at
to a certain place in the machining process that inducing a heavy
load on the axis drive.
>sending the
> Steps are being lost someplace. Could be a software bug. Try
> program to the appropriate software folks and see if they can fixtheir
> software or tell you what is wrong with your Gcode.TurboCnc
>
> Try running the Gcode with a different Gcode interpreter like
> or EMC.same .033" every time from zero. Not .033" then .066" then .099".
>
> > If it were a mechanical backlash issue it would still be out the
>timg@k...
> Agreed.
>
> Tom Hubin
> thubin@e...
>
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@a...,
> Moderator: pentam@c... indigo_red@q... davemucha@j... [Moderators]aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach
> URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>
> OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
it if you have trouble.
> http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.htmla sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be
there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
>THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
> NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING
> bill
> List Mom
> List Owner
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
kdoney_63021
2004-09-15 12:36:49 UTC
Backlash problem?
R Rogers
2004-09-15 17:21:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Backlash problem?
volitan712003
2004-09-15 18:25:29 UTC
Re: Backlash problem?
R Rogers
2004-09-15 18:53:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Backlash problem?
Tom Hubin
2004-09-16 11:42:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Backlash problem?
R Rogers
2004-09-16 13:27:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Backlash problem?
kdoney_63021
2004-09-17 07:09:32 UTC
Re: Backlash problem? - Solved
Jon Elson
2004-09-17 09:21:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Backlash problem? - Solved
kdoney_63021
2004-09-17 11:49:07 UTC
Univ Step Ctrl - was Re: Backlash problem? - Solved
Jon Elson
2004-09-17 18:13:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Univ Step Ctrl - was Re: Backlash problem? - Solved