CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: PMDX-131 should we revise for larger G202 drivers?

Posted by CalBoy101
on 2005-05-03 20:27:00 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "pmdx_cnc" <yahoo@p...> wrote:
> Shortly after the PMDX-131 breakout/motherboard combo for Gecko
> stepper motor drivers was announced there were new G202/212 drivers
> announced by Geckodrive. These new drivers have many great features,
> but are 3.125" wide versus the 2.5" footprint of the older
Geckodrive
> products.

The proposed size and price increase of the revised 131 are
inconsequential, so I think its pretty clear you should either offer
both systems or revise your design it so it will work with either
generation drive.

In my case I'm starting from scratch and will be waiting for the new
Geckos, so to get my order you'll need to be able to handle the new
ones. The fact of the matter is that probably most of your customers
are ones who will be starting from scratch and will be buying the new
Gecko drives, so you'll miss a lot of sales if you can't take those
orders.

Good luck-

Paul T.

Discussion Thread

pmdx_cnc 2005-05-02 11:47:31 UTC PMDX-131 should we revise for larger G202 drivers? jkbrennan 2005-05-02 12:20:32 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] PMDX-131 should we revise for larger G202 drivers? cnc_4_me 2005-05-02 15:44:59 UTC Re: PMDX-131 should we revise for larger G202 drivers? turbulatordude 2005-05-02 16:45:48 UTC Re: PMDX-131 should we revise for larger G202 drivers? CalBoy101 2005-05-03 20:27:00 UTC Re: PMDX-131 should we revise for larger G202 drivers?