Re: clever edge detector
Posted by
turbulatordude
on 2005-06-01 19:17:06 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "R. Wink" <rwwink@i...> wrote:
moving parts (the ball) and the movement of the ball is the thing
sensed, not the pressures or flows directly related to the proximity
of the sensed part.
small distinction, but a true fluidics device would have feedback
based on the alteration of the flow or pressure between the sensor and
the part.
Regardless, the idea is interesting and has potential.
Dave
> You might call it "Rube Goldberg" but it's based on sound "FLUIDIC"I think the technology is somewhat related to Fluidics, but there are
> principles and should have a very repeatable detection point.
> That said, it would seem to be a bit much for what it's doing but I have
> seen some places where an air system would be safer.
> R. Wink
moving parts (the ball) and the movement of the ball is the thing
sensed, not the pressures or flows directly related to the proximity
of the sensed part.
small distinction, but a true fluidics device would have feedback
based on the alteration of the flow or pressure between the sensor and
the part.
Regardless, the idea is interesting and has potential.
Dave
Discussion Thread
Graham Stabler
2005-06-01 15:25:40 UTC
clever edge detector
lcdpublishing
2005-06-01 17:01:57 UTC
Re: clever edge detector
R. Wink
2005-06-01 18:57:38 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: clever edge detector
Peter Reilley
2005-06-01 19:04:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] clever edge detector
turbulatordude
2005-06-01 19:17:06 UTC
Re: clever edge detector
lcdpublishing
2005-06-01 19:20:11 UTC
Re: clever edge detector
Graham Stabler
2005-06-03 16:30:48 UTC
Re: clever edge detector