CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: Interface. Gauging interest.

on 2006-05-17 12:03:28 UTC
The G2002 used 99 74HC devices. The 74HC283 is obsolete as are other
74HC devices used, the USB circuit is "cookbook" straight from FTDI,
the board had a million headers/shunts that had to be set and the
performance was 10% of the G-Rex.

Same principle as the G-Rex but it's an obsolete execution.

I still have about 50 stuffed and tested G2000s. These are being kept
for the 1,200 74HC283s they contain as spare parts to repair G320s
years from now.

In the meantime all our mainline drives will be converted to CPLD
design by the end of the year. First up will be the G203, a CPLD
equivalent of the G201.

Mariss



--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "ballendo" <ballendo@...>
wrote:
>
> Mariss,
>
> No worries. I'm not looking for anything. But I did mention that
> your prior work on the G2002 has great relevance for those who'd
> like to create USB "black boxes". So THEY may be looking for some
of
> the older work that has been removed for rerasons you mention.
>
> In respect,
>
> Ballendo
>
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Mariss Freimanis"
> <mariss92705@> wrote:
> >
> > What sort of stuff were you looking for? The "files" section is
> 83%
> > full right now; more current stuff gets added so from time to
time
> > old stuff must be removed to make room. I do this whenever it
> exceeds
> > 90% full.
> >
> > Mariss
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "ballendo" <ballendo@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Just know that the truly useful and most relevant stuff is no
> > longer
> > > at the geckodrive yahoo group. (Mariss DID give folks PLENTIFUL
> > > notice and fair warning that it was going to be deleted.
> > >
> > > Just didn't want somebody to look at what's still there and
> think
> > > that's what my comments are based upon.
> > >
> > > Ballendo
> > >
> > > --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Alan Marconett"
> <KM6VV@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Ballendo,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks. I'll look at that. I'd like to get my head around
> > > Mariss' velocity
> > > > based calculations (for the 2nd time).
> > > >
> > > > I have read and re-read some of his papers.
> > > >
> > > > Alan KM6VV
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Alan
> > > > >
> > > > > All the old G2002 files. From when it was an open source
> > project.
> > > > >
> > > > > Ballendo
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Discussion Thread

John Stevenson 2006-05-12 00:47:17 UTC Re: Interface. Gauging interest. Dennis Schmitz 2006-05-16 16:30:51 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest. ballendo 2006-05-16 16:39:54 UTC Re: Interface. Gauging interest. Alan Marconett 2006-05-16 17:35:25 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest. Mariss Freimanis 2006-05-16 18:30:50 UTC Re: Interface. Gauging interest. ballendo 2006-05-17 06:13:16 UTC Re: Interface. Gauging interest. Alan Marconett 2006-05-17 09:58:00 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest. ballendo 2006-05-17 10:20:30 UTC Re: Interface. Gauging interest. Mariss Freimanis 2006-05-17 10:27:33 UTC Re: Interface. Gauging interest. ballendo 2006-05-17 10:36:16 UTC Re: Interface. Gauging interest. Alan Marconett 2006-05-17 11:13:53 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest. Alan Marconett 2006-05-17 11:24:38 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Interface. Gauging interest. Mariss Freimanis 2006-05-17 12:03:28 UTC Re: Interface. Gauging interest.