Re: Re: 1800 ipm router..
Posted by
John Stevenson
on 2006-05-22 01:58:48 UTC
> Dan,In which case do your own homework.
>
> I think you're probably right, and Mariss posted on my DIY-CNC group
> about some other engineering based speculation regarding motors.
>
> How much nicer to just be given the answers to these basics?
>
> It's kind of like seeing a racecar win a race and then being told,
> when asked what's under the hood, "It may change, so we won't say"
>
> I hear from the grapevine some feel I'm trying to get Ron to reverse
> engineer his product for us/me.
>
> No need there. I have enough knowledge to design my own, and as we
> can see from Dan and Mariss's post's, reverse engineering
> without "help" is easy to do. Beside's that, Ron's goals and mine
> would seem to be at opposite ends of the CNC continuum.
>
It really annoys me when people have to have their hands held for the least mundane thing.
And if I were Ron the last thing I'd worry about was seeing it reverse engineered under the Bullshit banner.
John S.
Discussion Thread
John Stevenson
2006-05-22 01:58:48 UTC
Re: Re: 1800 ipm router..
ballendo
2006-05-22 02:35:47 UTC
Re: 1800 ipm router..
lcdpublishing
2006-05-22 04:06:11 UTC
Re: 1800 ipm router..
ballendo
2006-05-22 04:23:12 UTC
Re: 1800 ipm router..
John Stevenson
2006-05-22 04:52:25 UTC
Re: Re: 1800 ipm router..
lcdpublishing
2006-05-22 05:15:56 UTC
Re: 1800 ipm router..
ballendo
2006-05-22 05:26:00 UTC
Enough already was Re: 1800 ipm router..
ballendo
2006-05-22 05:28:41 UTC
Re: 1800 ipm router..