CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: path efficiency

on 2006-06-04 21:32:33 UTC
On Sunday 04 June 2006 02:16 pm, wanliker@... wrote:
> In a message dated 6/4/2006 12:13:01 P.M. Mountain Daylight Time,
> imserv@... writes:
>
> I think we are moving a bit past the basic purpose of the group,
> when we start discussing big commercial machine optimizations.
>
> Fred, thank you for your input, but the above still stands, review the
> purpose of the group. It is not aimed at commercial machine operations.

I don't see anything in that post that's "aimed at commercial machine
operations" and in fact he referred to building machines in there.

So, YOUR foray into stuff that's nowhere near the topic of this list is
perfectly okay when you're into it, but other people's maneuvering even a
little bit in the direction of where you perceive the edge to be isn't?

Right...

--
Member of the toughest, meanest, deadliest, most unrelenting -- and
ablest -- form of life in this section of space, a critter that can
be killed but can't be tamed. --Robert A. Heinlein, "The Puppet Masters"
-
Information is more dangerous than cannon to a society ruled by lies. --James
M Dakin

Discussion Thread

BRIAN FOLEY 2006-06-04 09:58:58 UTC path efficiency wanliker@a... 2006-06-04 10:12:39 UTC path efficiency Fred Smith 2006-06-04 11:12:44 UTC Re: path efficiency wanliker@a... 2006-06-04 11:24:53 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: path efficiency Roy J. Tellason 2006-06-04 21:32:33 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: path efficiency