Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: [sherline] Re: Subject: DRO accuracy
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2000-07-10 22:41:05 UTC
wanliker@... wrote:
repeatability
is harder, and you need both of these before you can even talk about
ACCURACY. I note that a lot of the lower-cost digital calipers are
not rated AT ALL for accuracy. I got an $80 Chinese-made caliper, and
it is less accurate than a VERY heavily used dial caliper that I've been
(ab)using for years. The error is only about .002 - .003" at the worst,
but that is significant.
Jon
> In a message dated 7/10/00 11:08:12 AM Mountain Daylight Time,Great! But, what about the TOUGH one? Resolution is easy,
> wanliker@... writes:
>
> << Repeatability: .005/.01mm, >>
> This should have been .0005
repeatability
is harder, and you need both of these before you can even talk about
ACCURACY. I note that a lot of the lower-cost digital calipers are
not rated AT ALL for accuracy. I got an $80 Chinese-made caliper, and
it is less accurate than a VERY heavily used dial caliper that I've been
(ab)using for years. The error is only about .002 - .003" at the worst,
but that is significant.
Jon
Discussion Thread
wanliker@a...
2000-07-10 10:27:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: [sherline] Re: Subject: DRO accuracy
Jerry Kimberlin
2000-07-10 18:51:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: [sherline] Re: Subject: DRO accuracy
Jon Elson
2000-07-10 22:41:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: [sherline] Re: Subject: DRO accuracy
Alvaro Fogassa
2000-07-11 16:16:42 UTC
[sherline] Re: Subject: DRO accuracy