Re: thanks for nothing
Posted by
Graham Stabler
on 2006-07-25 16:10:52 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "ta_mechanos" <mechanos@...>
wrote:
read your post entitled "hello". This was not because I don't want to
help but because like many others I don't have time to read everything.
Secondly breaking your post up with a bit of white space makes it
easier to read, it lets people pick out the questions. Even after
reading your post I nearly missed the fact that you were actually
asking for any help and there was not nearly enough information for
anyone to comment on the suitability of drivers or servos.
As for the "thanks for nothing", I don't see how that will encourage
anyone to spend there time replying to your questions.
Graham
wrote:
>The first step is give your thread a meaningful title. I didn't even
> well i thought i found a good place to get some help...guess i was
> mistakin
>
read your post entitled "hello". This was not because I don't want to
help but because like many others I don't have time to read everything.
Secondly breaking your post up with a bit of white space makes it
easier to read, it lets people pick out the questions. Even after
reading your post I nearly missed the fact that you were actually
asking for any help and there was not nearly enough information for
anyone to comment on the suitability of drivers or servos.
As for the "thanks for nothing", I don't see how that will encourage
anyone to spend there time replying to your questions.
Graham
Discussion Thread
ta_mechanos
2006-07-25 15:32:47 UTC
thanks for nothing
Pete Brown (YahooGroups)
2006-07-25 15:40:19 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] thanks for nothing
Graham Stabler
2006-07-25 16:10:52 UTC
Re: thanks for nothing