Re: BAllendo's wood Duck ?

Ken,
Our 4AUPC driver board has been superceded by our HobbyCNC Pro
driver board. Idle current reduction and many other features!

Dave Rigotti
HobbyCNC.com

--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "ballendo" <ballendo@...>
wrote:

>
> Dave,
>
> Per your request...
>
> I just put a bunch of pics in the CNC-pics list photos section.

Wood

> duck orig base 1212, WD1224 proto2, WD beta(with packaging test

pics)

> and a "prop" for Dave R as his rev 0 HCNC board is inside the

driver

> box<G>.
>
> Also a pic --or 2?-- of the Roadrunner1010 proto.
>
> And a pic of my 3 axis 7062 board...
>
> IOW, several pics that could qualify as HOME shop CNC.
>
> BTW, the large lathe behind the WD that's sitting on a table saw

is

> the Leblonde that John S once asked for pics of...
>
> You might notice that the orig WD base pic shows a cart full of
> aluminum linear bearing blocks for other machines...
>
> Perhaps the condescending comments can stop mow? Some of these

pics

> are over a year old. There are many more pics, but these should at
> least stop the doubters?
>
> Ballendo
>
> P.S. Even though the WD1224-p2 is in MDF, it might make a good

CCED

> group photo...
>
>
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "turbulatordude"
> <dave_mucha@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Ballendo
> > >
> > > P.S. Maybe if my Wood duck was the group picture, I could get
> away
> > > with flaming too!?
> >
> > If you send me a pic of the Wood Duck, I'll put it on the home

page.

> >
> > I had asked people for their completions, or projects or

whatever,

> but
> > there was very little interest.
> >
> > I am more than happy to rotate the home page pictures.
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > ps: anyone interested in being featured on the home page, you

can

> post
> > your pic at
> >
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CNC-pics
> >
> > send me an e-mail and I'll post it. (to let me know you posted

it)

> >
> > I wold prefer to not post commercial listings such as a machine
> > someone has for sale. but in your case Ballendo, I would make an
> > exception.
> >
>