Re: degrees of freedom - Hexapod
Posted by
turbulatordude
on 2006-08-21 09:09:36 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Graham Stabler" <eexgs@...>
wrote:
be sure.
The only thing it did not show was the table going striaght up and down.
But since the I had thought that the struts needed to be in some form
of tension, and the round table has all the struts at roughtly a 45
deg, it seems they are at a mechanically weak location. Yes, bigger
motors solves that problem.
How many people acutally offer such a thing on a new machining center ?
Dave
wrote:
>The video clip showed fixed struts and moving bases. Very clever to
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Raymond Heckert" <jnr@> wrote:
> >
> > Look closer... If you have 'fixed' length struts (I mean really
> fixed, not
> > extensible or retractible) the platform cannot move. On a hexapod,
> at least
> > two adjacent struts must be extensible to have even one degree of
> freedom.
> > four adjacent extensible struts should allow you 3 degrees of
> freedom, and
> > all 6 struts movable should give you your 6 degrees of freedom.
> ...Unless
> > my observations are greatly in error...
> >
> > RayHex
> >
>
>
> The struts do not have to change length you can change the position of
> there bases as is done in hexaglides and triaglides and delta robots.
>
> Graham
be sure.
The only thing it did not show was the table going striaght up and down.
But since the I had thought that the struts needed to be in some form
of tension, and the round table has all the struts at roughtly a 45
deg, it seems they are at a mechanically weak location. Yes, bigger
motors solves that problem.
How many people acutally offer such a thing on a new machining center ?
Dave
Discussion Thread
Dennis Schmitz
2006-08-18 21:52:10 UTC
degrees of freedom Was: Angle Iron Ways
Dennis Schmitz
2006-08-18 22:02:54 UTC
Re: degrees of freedom Was: Angle Iron Ways
Graham Stabler
2006-08-19 13:54:26 UTC
Re: degrees of freedom Was: Angle Iron Ways
Graham Stabler
2006-08-19 14:06:13 UTC
Re: degrees of freedom Was: Angle Iron Ways
leslie watts
2006-08-20 03:15:21 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: degrees of freedom Was: Angle Iron Ways
Dennis Schmitz
2006-08-20 13:24:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: degrees of freedom Was: Angle Iron Ways
Raymond Heckert
2006-08-20 18:31:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] degrees of freedom Was: Angle Iron Ways
Stephen Wille Padnos
2006-08-20 19:12:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] degrees of freedom Was: Angle Iron Ways
Dennis Schmitz
2006-08-20 20:30:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] degrees of freedom Was: Angle Iron Ways
Graham Stabler
2006-08-21 02:41:41 UTC
Re: degrees of freedom Was: Angle Iron Ways
Graham Stabler
2006-08-21 02:42:08 UTC
Re: degrees of freedom Was: Angle Iron Ways
Alan Marconett
2006-08-21 08:02:25 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] degrees of freedom Was: Angle Iron Ways
Stephen Wille Padnos
2006-08-21 08:15:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: degrees of freedom Was: Angle Iron Ways
turbulatordude
2006-08-21 09:09:36 UTC
Re: degrees of freedom - Hexapod
Graham Stabler
2006-08-21 11:37:52 UTC
Re: degrees of freedom - Hexapod
Dennis Schmitz
2006-08-21 18:38:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: degrees of freedom Was: Angle Iron Ways
Raymond Heckert
2006-08-22 22:20:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: degrees of freedom Was: Angle Iron Ways
Graham Stabler
2006-08-23 04:05:03 UTC
Re: degrees of freedom Was: Angle Iron Ways
Raymond Heckert
2006-08-23 07:24:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] degrees of freedom Was: Angle Iron Ways
Graham Stabler
2006-08-23 11:43:57 UTC
Re: degrees of freedom Was: Angle Iron Ways