Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Now for a change of pace: PlasmaCAM
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2006-09-01 20:03:39 UTC
Dennis Schmitz wrote:
no WAY
they can provide ACCURACY of .0005" in a machine that size. It would be
VERY expensive to provide such accuracy in a coordinate measuring machine
that size, if built of granite and air bearings, and kept in a
temperature-controlled
room. OH, but wait! They DO NOT claim such accuracy. The specs say
"resolution",
and that is perfectly reasonable.
I would guess an initial accuracy over the whole work envelope of .1" at
best, as I'm
sure they do the minimal amount of calibration. They probably use a
square to
set the orthogonality of the axes, and that is ALL.
I'm pretty sure the linear actuation is rack and pinion, and the axis
looks like
bearings roll along steel channels.
Jon
>All of this talk of water jet cutters and occasionally lasers led meThis is the classic confusion between resolution and accuracy. There's
>to this website.
>
>http://www.plasmacam.com/
>
>Apparently you're supposed to buy your own plasma torch, but in any
>case, it's a very spartan design of an xy table with a little bit of
>z. They claim accuracy of 0.0005 in the xy, making me curious how they
>built the actuators and bearings.
>
no WAY
they can provide ACCURACY of .0005" in a machine that size. It would be
VERY expensive to provide such accuracy in a coordinate measuring machine
that size, if built of granite and air bearings, and kept in a
temperature-controlled
room. OH, but wait! They DO NOT claim such accuracy. The specs say
"resolution",
and that is perfectly reasonable.
I would guess an initial accuracy over the whole work envelope of .1" at
best, as I'm
sure they do the minimal amount of calibration. They probably use a
square to
set the orthogonality of the axes, and that is ALL.
I'm pretty sure the linear actuation is rack and pinion, and the axis
looks like
bearings roll along steel channels.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Dennis Schmitz
2006-09-01 11:50:25 UTC
Now for a change of pace: PlasmaCAM
caudlet
2006-09-01 17:29:08 UTC
Re: Now for a change of pace: PlasmaCAM
afogassa
2006-09-01 18:18:39 UTC
Re: Now for a change of pace: PlasmaCAM
Jon Elson
2006-09-01 20:03:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Now for a change of pace: PlasmaCAM
turbulatordude
2006-09-01 23:47:55 UTC
Re: Now for a change of pace: PlasmaCAM
Ron Yost
2006-09-02 11:29:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Now for a change of pace: PlasmaCAM
Jon Elson
2006-09-02 19:22:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Now for a change of pace: PlasmaCAM
caudlet
2006-09-03 08:29:57 UTC
Re: Now for a change of pace: PlasmaCAM