Re: Now for a change of pace: PlasmaCAM
Posted by
turbulatordude
on 2006-09-01 23:47:55 UTC
>.1" at
> I would guess an initial accuracy over the whole work envelope of
> best, as I'mOne would expect a final test to be a pen plotter.
> sure they do the minimal amount of calibration. They probably use a
> square to
> set the orthogonality of the axes, and that is ALL.
>
a large square drawn, then rotated 90 deg, would show squareness
pretty well.
But, As you implied, alignment at the factory only needs to be
superficial. the breaking down, then boxing and reassembly would be
well past any factory calibration.
I wonder how much the sell for ?
Dave
Discussion Thread
Dennis Schmitz
2006-09-01 11:50:25 UTC
Now for a change of pace: PlasmaCAM
caudlet
2006-09-01 17:29:08 UTC
Re: Now for a change of pace: PlasmaCAM
afogassa
2006-09-01 18:18:39 UTC
Re: Now for a change of pace: PlasmaCAM
Jon Elson
2006-09-01 20:03:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Now for a change of pace: PlasmaCAM
turbulatordude
2006-09-01 23:47:55 UTC
Re: Now for a change of pace: PlasmaCAM
Ron Yost
2006-09-02 11:29:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Now for a change of pace: PlasmaCAM
Jon Elson
2006-09-02 19:22:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Now for a change of pace: PlasmaCAM
caudlet
2006-09-03 08:29:57 UTC
Re: Now for a change of pace: PlasmaCAM