CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam

Posted by ballendo
on 2007-03-24 18:54:04 UTC
John, Ron,

Thank you both for the detailed info. Sounds like it's time to see
what an upgrade to v22 will cost. Or perhaps v20 as Ron has found
enough utility there.

Really good to hear that the overzealous sales efforts have subsided!

Ballendo


--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "John Stevenson" <john@...>
wrote:
>
>
> >
> > What does 22 have over 20 or 21? Thats the exact question they
get from me
> > when they rarely contact me to upgrade. I ask what is in this
version that I
> > don't already have. If the list is short or uninteresting. I
stay with what I
> > have, hence I'm still using 20.
> >
> > Ron
> >
>
> So far from the little I have seen it's a completely new animal.
> More in like with Featurecam and Visualmill than the lookalike
V19, V20 and V21.
>
> Need to get a demo version first to evaluate more but they have
made a big move.
> perhaps like OneCNC who had a name change from the Bobcad styled
Auscad they may have done better with a new name to go with the new
program.
> Many didn't know the differences between V20 and V21 and may
assume V22 is just a face lift of V20 / 21 which it isn't.
>
> John S.
>

Discussion Thread

John Stevenson 2007-03-24 05:36:27 UTC Re: BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam John Stevenson 2007-03-24 10:04:05 UTC Re: BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam John Stevenson 2007-03-24 16:53:04 UTC Re: BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam Rodney Hill 2007-03-24 16:59:37 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam ballendo 2007-03-24 18:54:04 UTC Re: BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam