Re: Linear encoder and rotary motor servo
Posted by
optics22000
on 2007-08-01 06:20:53 UTC
Thanks to Steve for his explanation of the difference between printer
and CNC applications. It was, in short, that a CNC beats on the
servo much harder than a printer does, making it misbehave.
Graham,
I had imagined a simple implementation of the hexapod, using belts
stretched along the 6 rods, sort of like a rack, with a film encoder
also stretched along the rod. or perhaps cable drive.
The same objections that Steve brought up of separate motor and
encoder in a CNC environment would apply here.
Perhaps the dual encoder arrangement he mentioned would work.
regards-
Elliot
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Graham
Stabler" <grezmos@...> wrote:
and CNC applications. It was, in short, that a CNC beats on the
servo much harder than a printer does, making it misbehave.
Graham,
I had imagined a simple implementation of the hexapod, using belts
stretched along the 6 rods, sort of like a rack, with a film encoder
also stretched along the rod. or perhaps cable drive.
The same objections that Steve brought up of separate motor and
encoder in a CNC environment would apply here.
Perhaps the dual encoder arrangement he mentioned would work.
regards-
Elliot
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Graham
Stabler" <grezmos@...> wrote:
>than
>
> Its obviously nice to have a direct measure of position but other
> it being nice what is the advantage for the hexapod example youmention?
>
> Graham
>
Discussion Thread
elliot@h...
2007-07-31 16:03:42 UTC
Linear encoder and rotary motor servo
Stephen Wille Padnos
2007-07-31 16:33:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Linear encoder and rotary motor servo
Graham Stabler
2007-07-31 16:43:30 UTC
Re: Linear encoder and rotary motor servo
optics22000
2007-08-01 06:20:53 UTC
Re: Linear encoder and rotary motor servo
Graham Stabler
2007-08-01 10:08:18 UTC
Re: Linear encoder and rotary motor servo
Carl Mikkelsen
2007-08-02 07:29:10 UTC
Re: Linear encoder and rotary motor servo