Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Closed-loop steppers, was: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Posted by
Michael Fagan
on 2007-08-01 08:10:27 UTC
On 7/31/07, Jon Elson <elson@...> wrote:
how they gathered data from them. I know they are advertised to have a
faster "refresh rate" than optical ones but other than that I don't know the
exact specs.
The newall dro unit does have a serial port output on the back that gives
real inch measurements for each axis regularly (don't know the exact timing)
so I think it can be interfaced for some things.
I
movements (like the 120 ipm) and uses the DRO optical scales only for fine
positioning.
With the dual-encoder approach, what software supports that?
not software, it's got an entire hardware unit as well. See
http://www.acu-rite.com/index.cfm?PageID=56ABA3B5-F620-11D4-BC6400A0CC271CB6
I don't know exactly how they do it, but I do know that it's pretty
accurate.
Jon
>Right. I knew about the balls (I've got a set on the BP) but I didn't know
> Michael Fagan wrote:
> > The Newall system scales are available in a 5 um resolution and would
> > probably work for this application (they're not optical scales, they're
> > based on capacitance I think). Also, I believe that the Acu Rite
> MillPWR,
> > their turnkey cnc system, uses servos with rotary encoders for gross
> > positioning but relies on feedback from their glass scales for
> closed-loop
> > feedback, as well as the 3-axis DRO component of the system.
> Newall scales are based on steel bearing balls in a stainless
> tube, and use a magnetic sensing and interpolation scheme.
>
how they gathered data from them. I know they are advertised to have a
faster "refresh rate" than optical ones but other than that I don't know the
exact specs.
The newall dro unit does have a serial port output on the back that gives
real inch measurements for each axis regularly (don't know the exact timing)
so I think it can be interfaced for some things.
I
> have never seen Newall scales used in a CNC application, andRight, which is why the MillPWR has rotary encoders for doing the rapid
> therefore I worry that they may be too slow to readout for
> motion control. They say "sample period = 100 us", but I really
> don't know what that means. If it means that the max pulse rate
> is 10 KHz (1/100 us) then that may be a problem at 5 um.
> 5 um * 10 KHz = 50 mm/second, which is roughly 120 IPM. If the
> spec means that the pulses will not come out faster than 10 KHz,
> then the servo loop will get unstable as you near that speed.
> (I assume it would catch up later, no problem for a DRO,
> disastrous for a servo.)
>
movements (like the 120 ipm) and uses the DRO optical scales only for fine
positioning.
With the dual-encoder approach, what software supports that?
>It's Acurite's proprietary MillPWR unit, it's pretty unhackable AFAIK. It's
not software, it's got an entire hardware unit as well. See
http://www.acu-rite.com/index.cfm?PageID=56ABA3B5-F620-11D4-BC6400A0CC271CB6
I don't know exactly how they do it, but I do know that it's pretty
accurate.
Jon
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Discussion Thread
scyvt
2007-07-17 11:00:44 UTC
breakout boards plus - hard choice
technical_ducati
2007-07-17 11:15:04 UTC
Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Michael Fagan
2007-07-17 12:00:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] breakout boards plus - hard choice
caudlet
2007-07-17 15:49:41 UTC
Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
scyvt
2007-07-18 04:23:56 UTC
Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
turbulatordude
2007-07-18 07:38:46 UTC
Re: breakout boards - LINKS section
Jon Elson
2007-07-18 10:15:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
scyvt
2007-07-18 12:31:59 UTC
Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Jon Elson
2007-07-18 18:52:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Graham Stabler
2007-07-19 02:41:07 UTC
Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Mark Vaughan
2007-07-19 03:27:43 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Peter Homann
2007-07-19 03:46:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Graham Stabler
2007-07-19 04:17:28 UTC
Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
turbulatordude
2007-07-19 06:09:21 UTC
Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Graham Stabler
2007-07-19 06:36:00 UTC
Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Mark Vaughan
2007-07-19 09:10:13 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
R Rogers
2007-07-19 10:14:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Jon Elson
2007-07-19 10:17:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Mark Vaughan
2007-07-19 10:54:28 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Dan Mauch
2007-07-19 10:56:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Mark Vaughan
2007-07-19 11:06:41 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
R Rogers
2007-07-19 12:04:14 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Mark Vaughan
2007-07-19 12:43:28 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Peter Homann
2007-07-19 16:11:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
R Rogers
2007-07-19 16:16:43 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Paul Kelly
2007-07-19 18:21:51 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Peter Homann
2007-07-19 18:26:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Jon Elson
2007-07-19 18:32:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Jon Elson
2007-07-19 18:35:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Mark Vaughan
2007-07-20 00:29:17 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Mark Stacey
2007-07-20 02:36:28 UTC
Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Khanh-Vu
2007-07-20 09:07:25 UTC
NEED MANUAL FOR ROBOFIL 552
Jon Elson
2007-07-20 09:12:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
R Rogers
2007-07-20 09:33:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Henrik Olsson
2007-07-20 10:02:32 UTC
SV: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Jon Elson
2007-07-20 19:25:37 UTC
Re: SV: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Mark Vaughan
2007-07-21 01:21:05 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Mark Vaughan
2007-07-21 01:24:13 UTC
RE: SV: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
David G. LeVine
2007-07-21 10:06:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: breakout boards plus - hard choice
scyvt
2007-07-31 04:47:30 UTC
Closed-loop steppers, was: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Jon Elson
2007-07-31 10:11:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Closed-loop steppers, was: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Michael Fagan
2007-07-31 10:50:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Closed-loop steppers, was: breakout boards plus - hard choice
scyvt
2007-07-31 14:52:37 UTC
Re: Closed-loop steppers, was: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Jon Elson
2007-07-31 17:31:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Closed-loop steppers, was: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Jon Elson
2007-07-31 17:39:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Closed-loop steppers, was: breakout boards plus - hard choice
scyvt
2007-08-01 04:57:45 UTC
Re: Closed-loop steppers, was: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Michael Fagan
2007-08-01 08:10:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Closed-loop steppers, was: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Jon Elson
2007-08-01 10:05:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Closed-loop steppers, was: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Jon Elson
2007-08-01 10:14:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Closed-loop steppers, was: breakout boards plus - hard choice
Michael Fagan
2007-08-01 13:06:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Closed-loop steppers, was: breakout boards plus - hard choice