Re: List question

On Thu, 17 Jun 1999 00:37:52 -0600, "Tim Goldstein"
<timg@...> wrote:

>Actually, Fred Proctor (the honcho that is in charge of EMC over at the
>NIST) posted to the EMC list that they should subscribe here as there was
>more active discussion on EMC subjects here.(heavy paraphrase of his
>posting)

Good heavens, now WHY would he do a thing like that?? Oh well, I guess
it works both ways, eh? But IF that's the case, that's perhaps mutha
naicha's way of suggesting that the focus of a purely EMC list is
sub-optimally narrow? But geez, how can that be?; EMC alone is no
smallish puppy, in itself. Guess I dunno.

It's a problem similar to evolution maybe, that shows just how much
diversity or focus is the best balance. A successful organism is a
flexible one. Heh.

Gar