CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Converting a Bridgeport Clone

on 2011-04-19 06:30:06 UTC
Either will work but ... as it depends (grin .. like always).
The limiter will be your acme screw efficiency.

Neglecting screw efficiency:
Lbs = pi * TPI * in-oz / 8
3 Nm is about 400 oz-in, btw.

Lbs = pi * 5 (tpi) * 400 / 8 = 785 Lbs = 365 kg.
At 80% (mechanical losses x ballscrew effiency) this is 280 kg force.

Using the smaller motors, for example with 3 Nm motors, at 1:3 gearing,
and a 80% efficient screw the thrust produced is 280 kg.
I use this size, 3Nm, nema 23 motors, at 1:3, to move my milling table.
Table is 160 cm wide, 50 cm deep, 6 cm thick (on ribs), solid (F1
calibrado) tool steel.
I have a 0.750 inch ballscrew, 0.200 inch rise or 5 tpi, at about 90%
efficient, and the table is on linear rails.
(Linear rails are about 98% efficent, and HTD belts are about 97%
efficient).
Table can be moved by one finger (under 10 kg force required).
Table mass is 240 kg give or take.
Acceleration is excellent as is accuracy (better than 0.01 mm).
Gecko251s, 48 V dc.

HOWEVER, the acme screw is going to be about 10-20% efficient, and you
will have a lot of static start-up friction.
Likewise, you are not on linear rails.

The force achieved at 1:6 (very big secondary pullies at 1:6, btw), with
the smaller motor, will certainly move it.
But I think you wont have a lot of margin.
As in you will get slow acceleration if you program for worst case, and
missed steps otherwise.
Acme screw stiction varies a lot with how clean it is, lubrication, if
you leave it to stand, cold/warm etc.
I would definitely use the bigger motor for this app.

However, I would not use belts but a worm gear.
It is much more efficient, much more accurate, wont break, wont
backdrive, is a better fit.
IMO.
A 10:1 -20:1 worm will work fine with the smaller motor, and will be
much more accurate.

I did my (stock) M-head quill with belts, and will now re-do it with a
worm, fwiw.
Probably also preload it, upwards, get rid of backlash.

> It has been a long time since I posted on this group and I notice
> there is not so much activity these days. Anyway on to my question:
>
> I have a Bridgeport clone and want to fit a stepper to the knee and I
> am unsure of the size of stepper motor to do the job properly. I was
> thinking of buying the motors from Arc Euro Trade here in the UK along
> with their drivers:
>
> http://www.arceurotrade.co.uk/Catalogue/Stepper-Motors/Stepper-Motors
>
> If it takes 11.5 foot lbs of force to lift the knee and there are
> 135.581795 newtons centimetre to one foot/pound, and I am thinking of
> a 6:1 reduction ratio on a toothed belt, what size motor would I need
> for reliable operation? I am confused about holding torque and moving
> force.
>
> Would I need the stepper 160-010-00500 @ 4.2A 650Ncm or will
> 160-010-00450 @ 4.2A 350Ncm do the job?
>
> Regards, Terry
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Discussion Thread

wotisname 2011-04-19 05:06:59 UTC Converting a Bridgeport Clone Roland Jollivet 2011-04-19 05:23:40 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Converting a Bridgeport Clone wotisname 2011-04-19 06:00:18 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Converting a Bridgeport Clone CNC 6-axis Designs 2011-04-19 06:30:06 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Converting a Bridgeport Clone Roland Jollivet 2011-04-19 06:54:05 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Converting a Bridgeport Clone Dan Mauch 2011-04-19 08:59:52 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Converting a Bridgeport Clone wotisname 2011-04-21 04:13:31 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Converting a Bridgeport Clone pmpcaddy 2011-04-23 19:02:29 UTC Re: Converting a Bridgeport Clone CNC 6-axis Designs 2011-04-24 00:56:44 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Converting a Bridgeport Clone pmpcaddy 2011-04-25 20:57:26 UTC Re: Converting a Bridgeport Clone Rjreese29 2011-05-01 16:47:58 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Converting a Bridgeport Clone