Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Firearm discussion is now closed.
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2000-08-23 15:42:14 UTC
wanliker@... wrote:
involved in a political
feud, either, but when this comes down to someone stating, quite
clearly, that SEVERAL
persons were convicted and imprisoned for mere possession of aluminum
bar stock,
then I think we need to explore this some more. I suspect that that
person's statement
was not completely factual, and the imprisoned home shop machinists were
actually
DOING something with that stock that was illegal. I have posed that
question, and would
like for the person that made that statement to clarify it, if he would.
I hope I don't get banned for this breach.
Jon
>OOps, I didn't see this until after a posting. I don't want to get
>
> I think the FIREARMS discussion is now closed, there is little in
> that
> discussion that will help the list subjects. And a lot that can get a
> FLAME
> war started.
involved in a political
feud, either, but when this comes down to someone stating, quite
clearly, that SEVERAL
persons were convicted and imprisoned for mere possession of aluminum
bar stock,
then I think we need to explore this some more. I suspect that that
person's statement
was not completely factual, and the imprisoned home shop machinists were
actually
DOING something with that stock that was illegal. I have posed that
question, and would
like for the person that made that statement to clarify it, if he would.
I hope I don't get banned for this breach.
Jon
Discussion Thread
wanliker@a...
2000-08-22 23:31:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Firearm discussion is now closed.
Jon Elson
2000-08-23 15:42:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Firearm discussion is now closed.
Matt Shaver
2000-08-23 18:36:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Firearm discussion is now closed.