Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
Posted by
ptengin@a...
on 2000-08-23 16:35:39 UTC
In a message dated 08/23/2000 2:51:23 AM Hawaiian Standard Time,
ginger@... writes:
<< I am misisng something here- isnt this exactly what we have with
egroups? A free service, a place to post files that members can share,
a way to discuss those files. Why use anything else?
I believe the reason for restricting attachments to posts was to reduce the
groups "liability" in case of virus infections etc. I think the files being
dropped into the file area are restricted by our "group charter". I
personally have no problem with it, however, I will go around obstructions in
the road to get somewhere. How and where do you draw the line at what is Spam
or other undesirable posts? I just suggested a way to get around the
objections some may raise. We don't need to step on toes no matter how
trivial if there are easy ways around it....
Peter
THRD, Inc.
ginger@... writes:
<< I am misisng something here- isnt this exactly what we have with
egroups? A free service, a place to post files that members can share,
a way to discuss those files. Why use anything else?
>>Ron,
I believe the reason for restricting attachments to posts was to reduce the
groups "liability" in case of virus infections etc. I think the files being
dropped into the file area are restricted by our "group charter". I
personally have no problem with it, however, I will go around obstructions in
the road to get somewhere. How and where do you draw the line at what is Spam
or other undesirable posts? I just suggested a way to get around the
objections some may raise. We don't need to step on toes no matter how
trivial if there are easy ways around it....
Peter
THRD, Inc.
Discussion Thread
mgrady
2000-08-22 22:59:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
wanliker@a...
2000-08-22 23:54:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
Ron Ginger
2000-08-23 05:49:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
Ron Ginger
2000-08-23 06:19:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
Art Fenerty
2000-08-23 08:08:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
Tim Goldstein
2000-08-23 09:06:25 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
ptengin@a...
2000-08-23 16:35:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
Mariss Freimanis
2000-08-23 18:00:15 UTC
Regarding the controversy
Tim Goldstein
2000-08-23 18:08:33 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] commercialization of the list?
Tim Goldstein
2000-08-23 18:55:48 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy
diazden
2000-08-23 20:43:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy
wanliker@a...
2000-08-23 21:25:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy
hans
2000-08-23 21:30:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy
James Cullins
2000-08-23 21:44:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy
Mariss Freimanis
2000-08-23 22:21:43 UTC
Re: Regarding the controversy
John Craddock
2000-08-23 22:45:44 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Regarding the controversy
ballendo@y...
2000-08-24 00:30:27 UTC
Re: Regarding the controversy