CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: Lost Steps (Me again)

Posted by Ozzie@h...
on 2000-08-29 06:11:33 UTC
All,
To add to the mystery:
I had told Tim that these motors were 150 in-oz motors, (much smaller
than his), but this morning I just recieved identification of the
motors from the Italian manufacturer, saying that they are 474 in-oz,
90 Volts, 4 Amps!

Tim's motor are 550's and he's running a 450mhz computer compared to
my 200 mhz.

Could my current be set too low? The Camtronics board is putting out
37 volts and set for 2.86 amps.

Regarding the acceleration;
I can try a lower number, but the problem occurs at low feeds, i.e.
below 7ipm!
Jerry





--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com, "Matt Shaver" <mshaver@e...>
wrote:
> > From: Tim Goldstein <timg@k...>
> > The system he is using was set up with freqmod. It is a Pentium
classic
> 200.
> > The period had to be set pretty high to get any reasonable
responsiveness
> > from the GUI. Following is the .ini file Jerry started with. Not
sure of
> any
> > changes he made.
> <...>
> > ; Base task period, in seconds
> > PERIOD = 0.000015
>
> This works out (if my math is right) to a PERIOD of 18 ticks of the
CH0 clock
> on the 8254 CTC. Gack! I was running 11 or 12 on my last machine
and
that was
> with a 350MHz Pentium2.
>
> > [TASK]
> > CYCLE_TIME = 0.010
> > DEFAULT_VELOCITY = 0.1
> > MAX_VELOCITY = 0.6
> > DEFAULT_ACCELERATION = 6.0
> > MAX_ACCELERATION = 6.0
>
> WOW! 6.0! Even 3.0, as Jerry said he reduced it to in his follow-up
post, is
> pretty high. I'm freaking out because I can't find a copy of the
.ini file I
> used for the BOSS Bridgeport I did, so I can't tell exactly what I
used. I
> think it was about 1.0, but I'm going to try and find that file...
>
> > [AXIS_0]
> > MAX_VELOCITY = 0.3
> > P = 1000.000
>
> You might try lowering P to 200 or so.
>
> > FF0 = 0.000
>
> You could also try adding FF0 gain if you lower P. I wish I had
that
file...
>
> > INPUT_SCALE = 8000 0
> > OUTPUT_SCALE = 8000 0.000
>
> Oh boy :( My machine had a scale of 4000 and I couldn't get a
velocity
> greater than 0.9 reliably.
>
> > MIN_OUTPUT = -10
> > MAX_OUTPUT = 10
>
> I also think I let the [TRAJ]MAX_VELOCITY stay at .9 and limited
the
axes
> with MIN & MAX_OUTPUT, but that might not be necessary with the per
axis
> MAX_VELOCITY settings (that must be new...).
>
> I hadn't been following this thread closely, so I went back and
read
a bunch
> of the posts. If this machine is a Shoptask just like Tim's, I
wonder what
> the difference is? Motors? PC? He's using the same Camtronics board
as Tim.
>
> Does Jerry live anywhere near Maryland? Probably not... How about
Colorado?
>
> This may be a problem soluble only with a faster PC, or an external
step
> pulse generator (I hope to have this in the not too distant
future).
Either
> that or you'll have to stay with one of the other software packages
that
> freezes the GUI during moves to gain better control of the step
pulse output
> frequency stability.
>
> Matt
>
> P.S. I'll look for that file tomorrow, but I don't see why Tim's
file
> wouldn't work. Are you guys running the same OS and EMC versions?

Discussion Thread

Jon Elson 2000-08-28 21:42:04 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Lost Steps (Me again) Matt Shaver 2000-08-28 22:02:29 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Lost Steps (Me again) Tim Goldstein 2000-08-28 22:08:33 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Lost Steps (Me again) Tim Goldstein 2000-08-28 22:20:47 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Lost Steps (Me again) Ozzie@h... 2000-08-28 22:26:44 UTC Re: Lost Steps (Me again) Jon Elson 2000-08-28 23:00:47 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Lost Steps (Me again) Matt Shaver 2000-08-29 00:05:17 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Lost Steps (Me again) Ozzie@h... 2000-08-29 06:11:33 UTC Re: Lost Steps (Me again) Carlos Guillermo 2000-08-29 08:04:09 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Lost Steps (Me again) Tim Goldstein 2000-08-29 08:19:00 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Lost Steps (Me again)