Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost Steps => time for microprocessors!
Posted by
dave engvall
on 2000-08-30 07:22:01 UTC
Jon Elson wrote:
running.
>Indeed 5 Hz is awful slow. I surprised that the default isn't 20 Hz. I may have a better feel for this after I get emc up and
> >
> > >Hi, this is Dave:
> > >
> > >Just to be dumb and innocent....how often is the gui getting updated?
> > Since the system is really in program mode....updating the
> > >gui at 10-20 Hz might look klutzy but certainly not affect the
> > control: which is more important?
running.
>
> > >
>
> I believe the standard GUI update is 5 Hz, which is too slow for my
> liking.
> I don't want it to keep jogging for up to .2 seconds AFTER I take my
> finger OFF the jog buttons! So I always up the GUI rate to 10 Hz.
> If the GUI were going much more than 10 hz, the numbers would be a blur.
>
> Jon
>
> Welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...,an unmoderated list for the discussion of shop built systems, for CAD, CAM, EDM, and DRO.
>
> Addresses:
> Post message: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@egroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@egroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@egroups.com, wanliker@...
> Moderator: jmelson@... [Moderator]
> URL to this page: http://www.egroups.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> bill,
> List Manager
Discussion Thread
wanliker@a...
2000-08-29 13:53:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost Steps => time for microprocessors!
Jon Elson
2000-08-29 16:02:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost Steps => time for microprocessors!
Jeff Barlow
2000-08-29 17:00:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost Steps => time for microprocessors!
dave engvall
2000-08-29 18:01:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost Steps => time for microprocessors!
dave engvall
2000-08-29 18:04:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost Steps => time for microprocessors!
Jeff Barlow
2000-08-29 18:22:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost Steps => time for microprocessors!
Art Fenerty
2000-08-29 18:22:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost Steps => time for microprocessors!
Jon Elson
2000-08-29 22:38:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost Steps => time for microprocessors!
Jon Elson
2000-08-29 22:59:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost Steps => time for microprocessors!
Ron Ginger
2000-08-30 06:45:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost Steps => time for microprocessors!
dave engvall
2000-08-30 07:22:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost Steps => time for microprocessors!
Tim Goldstein
2000-08-30 08:53:10 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost Steps => time for microprocessors!
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2000-08-30 10:49:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost Steps => time for microprocessors!
Jeff Barlow
2000-08-30 11:45:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost Steps => time for microprocessors!
Jon Elson
2000-08-30 12:50:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost Steps => time for microprocessors!
Jon Elson
2000-08-30 13:17:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost Steps => time for microprocessors!
Jon Elson
2000-08-30 13:27:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost Steps => time for microprocessors!
Carlos Guillermo
2000-08-30 21:19:10 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost Steps => time for microprocessors!
Jon Elson
2000-08-31 13:41:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lost Steps => time for microprocessors!