Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: emc success
Posted by
Jeff Barlow
on 2000-11-20 16:56:57 UTC
Wally,
Pardon me for butting in here, but.... In my experience the main problem
(if any) with tantalums is that they are simply far less tolerant of
abuse than other capacitors. Also, when they do fail, they make a louder
noise. It's easy to find the dead one, though. You just look for the two
leads where the cap used to be.
Jeff
Pardon me for butting in here, but.... In my experience the main problem
(if any) with tantalums is that they are simply far less tolerant of
abuse than other capacitors. Also, when they do fail, they make a louder
noise. It's easy to find the dead one, though. You just look for the two
leads where the cap used to be.
Jeff
On Tue, 21 Nov 2000 00:37:18 -0000, Wally wrote:
>Hi Mariss, what is your point about the tantalum caps. If you abuse
>anything it will break. I am talking about tantalum caps in normal
>operation.
>
>
Discussion Thread
dave engvall
2000-11-18 11:54:28 UTC
emc success
Jon Elson
2000-11-18 22:43:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc success
dave engvall
2000-11-19 08:38:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc success
Jon Elson
2000-11-19 23:28:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc success
Wally K
2000-11-20 00:56:13 UTC
Re: emc success
Jon Elson
2000-11-20 12:01:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: emc success
Wally K
2000-11-20 13:28:57 UTC
Re: emc success
Mariss Freimanis
2000-11-20 15:49:49 UTC
Re: emc success
Wally K
2000-11-20 16:37:39 UTC
Re: emc success
Jeff Barlow
2000-11-20 16:56:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: emc success
Wally K
2000-11-20 17:15:48 UTC
Re: emc success
Jeff Barlow
2000-11-20 17:53:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: emc success
Wally K
2000-11-20 18:28:13 UTC
Re: emc success