Re: emc success
Posted by
Wally K
on 2000-11-20 18:28:13 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com, Jeff Barlow <jeff@b...> wrote:
Well if a tantalum routinely blows in your circuit would'nt you say
that it is clue that you are not using the tantalum properly. I do
not have any problems with tantalums in my circuits.
> Wally,old
>
> I'm deeply offended, I poorly designed that stuff myself. :)
>
> Yes, I used to make a living designing hardware. After the third or
> forth tantalum pops in the prototype we tend to switch to a regular
> Al foil electrolytic for the production boards.Wally K. replys;
>
Well if a tantalum routinely blows in your circuit would'nt you say
that it is clue that you are not using the tantalum properly. I do
not have any problems with tantalums in my circuits.
Discussion Thread
dave engvall
2000-11-18 11:54:28 UTC
emc success
Jon Elson
2000-11-18 22:43:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc success
dave engvall
2000-11-19 08:38:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc success
Jon Elson
2000-11-19 23:28:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc success
Wally K
2000-11-20 00:56:13 UTC
Re: emc success
Jon Elson
2000-11-20 12:01:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: emc success
Wally K
2000-11-20 13:28:57 UTC
Re: emc success
Mariss Freimanis
2000-11-20 15:49:49 UTC
Re: emc success
Wally K
2000-11-20 16:37:39 UTC
Re: emc success
Jeff Barlow
2000-11-20 16:56:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: emc success
Wally K
2000-11-20 17:15:48 UTC
Re: emc success
Jeff Barlow
2000-11-20 17:53:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: emc success
Wally K
2000-11-20 18:28:13 UTC
Re: emc success