Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc success
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2000-11-18 22:43:55 UTC
dave engvall wrote:
xemc to not work. But, TKemc is the latest development, and the most
sophisticated.
Jon
> Jon Elson wrote:How odd! There must be something wrong with a resource file or something, for
>
> > YES! This is good news! You are nearly THERE!
>
> snip>
>
> > The easiest thing is to change the polarity
> > sense of the e-stop signal (a name something like
> > E_STOP_POLARITY) in the .INI file to be the opposite.
>
> Also had to fiddle with the polarity on the limit switches for each axis. For some reason it worked with them opposite polarity.
> At least for me that is non-intuitive!
> NOW... home works, jog + & - works. Numbers are yellow. Definite progress. Now I need the interface boards to continue.
>
> xemc still gives me just the framework for xemc not the fill-in. Had to look at your page (see below) to find out what xemc should
> look like.
>
> TKemc seems to work fine.
xemc to not work. But, TKemc is the latest development, and the most
sophisticated.
Jon
Discussion Thread
dave engvall
2000-11-18 11:54:28 UTC
emc success
Jon Elson
2000-11-18 22:43:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc success
dave engvall
2000-11-19 08:38:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc success
Jon Elson
2000-11-19 23:28:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc success
Wally K
2000-11-20 00:56:13 UTC
Re: emc success
Jon Elson
2000-11-20 12:01:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: emc success
Wally K
2000-11-20 13:28:57 UTC
Re: emc success
Mariss Freimanis
2000-11-20 15:49:49 UTC
Re: emc success
Wally K
2000-11-20 16:37:39 UTC
Re: emc success
Jeff Barlow
2000-11-20 16:56:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: emc success
Wally K
2000-11-20 17:15:48 UTC
Re: emc success
Jeff Barlow
2000-11-20 17:53:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: emc success
Wally K
2000-11-20 18:28:13 UTC
Re: emc success