CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: tantalum caps was emc success

Posted by Jeff Barlow
on 2000-11-20 18:16:06 UTC
Ballendo,

Relax, if they are going to pop, it usually happens in the first day or
two of life of your first prototype. But you do need to understand that
you can't just blindly substitute them for another cap of the same
value.

We all tend to think of passive components as generic jellybeans. Many
times, though, their selection takes as much care as that of IC's.

Jeff

On Tue, 21 Nov 2000 01:48:42 -0000, Ballendo wrote:

>Wally K, Jeff, Jon E, Mariss, List,
>
>I too have used tantalums' where they seemed to make sense. Never
>blown one up. No electrolytics, either. So I gotta ask myself, "Do I
>feel lucky?... Well, Do I...?
>
>What I want to know is:
>Is this a situation (like selenium rectifiers, and OLD paper/wax
>capacitors) where the value, or other operational characteristics (of
>the tantalum cap) change, and LEAD to the "flash, Bang, and white
>smoke"?
>
>Or is it like Wally K sez, Bad DESIGN practice???
>
>I'd sure like as definitive answer as possible! (I've got
>tantalums "out there"!)
>
>Ballendo
>

Discussion Thread

ballendo@y... 2000-11-20 17:48:45 UTC Re: tantalum caps was emc success Mariss Freimanis 2000-11-20 18:12:18 UTC Re: tantalum caps was emc success Jeff Barlow 2000-11-20 18:16:06 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: tantalum caps was emc success Wally K 2000-11-20 18:21:22 UTC Re: tantalum caps was emc success Wally K 2000-11-20 18:36:13 UTC Re: tantalum caps was emc success Jeff Barlow 2000-11-20 18:56:01 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: tantalum caps was emc success Jon Elson 2000-11-20 22:00:16 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: tantalum caps was emc success ballendo@y... 2000-11-20 22:21:27 UTC Re: Re: tantalum caps was emc success Jon Elson 2000-11-21 21:46:36 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: tantalum caps was emc success Jeff Barlow 2000-11-22 08:02:55 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: tantalum caps was emc success